Thu, May 22, 2008
Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.
![]()
Image (c) University of Leicester
All of us here at Environmental Graffiti care a lot about the planet. True, we tend to look at details: bizarre environmental news, trends and things that not that many people notice. Despite this, sometimes, just sometimes it’s important to look at the bigger picture.
That’s why I was personally fascinated and slightly horrified about a new map that shows just how much vegetation has been burned by fires on our planet. The visual impression of fire scars spans from 2000 to 2007 and was created by Geographer Dr Kevin Tansey of the University of Leicester.
The map graphically illustrates the destruction of roughly 4.5 million km2 of vegetation that is caused by fire every single year. To put this in perspective, the area is bigger than a country like India, which is enormous!
So how is the data captured?
With massive supercomputers and satellites of course. The European satellite SPOT, collects reflected solar energy on a daily basis and provides global coverage. When the vegetation burns, the reflected energy is changed long enough to make an observation of the scar. Supercomputers in Belgium then process the data.
This information useful because not only can it help scientists predict the latest forest fires and help extinguish them quickly, but it is also vital for understanding the effect the fires will have on global warming.
But what about areas that need to be deliberately cleared for agriculture?
Most of the fires occur in Africa of course and the system can be sustainable in the savannah grasslands, as the grass can regenerate extremely fast during monsoon season – there is an equilibrium from a carbon perspective, as the regeneration of vegetation acts as a carbon sink. It’s also nature’s way of clearing forest floors, so that further regeneration of flora and fauna can take place.
However, fires in forests are notoriously diabolical for global warming, as the area becomes a carbon emitter for a number of years. Dr Tansey says:
“The forest fires last summer in Greece and in Portugal a couple of years back, remind us that we need to understand the impact of fire on the environment and climate to manage the vegetation of the planet more effectively. Probably 95% of all vegetation fires have a human source; crop stubble burning, forest clearance, hunting, arson are all causes of fire across the globe. Fire has been a feature of the planet in the past and under a scenario of a warmer environment will certainly be a feature in the future”.
One our previous contributors Richard Rhodes witnessed influential locals creating forest fires in Thailand. You can see what damage they caused below:
Source: University of Leicester Press Release
Environmental Graffiti is up for four bloggers’ choice awards. You can vote for us for best entertainment blog, best blog of all time, best geek blog and best animal blogger.
If you want to find out all the latest news on the environment, why not subscribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.
“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”
May 23rd, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Forest fires are natural and usually beneficial as you mention. They shouldn’t be “stopped” because of global warming. That’s stupid, let’s stop earthquakes while we’re at it.
May 23rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
why is the argument about europe when the picture is of africa?
May 23rd, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Ooh, I’m all for stopping the earthquakes (even hurricanes, acid rain & possibly spiders) but fires??? this stuff is very natural and has a cleansing effect.
Africa is very dry and baron around these parts. Get a real picture about an inhabited area before the digg bait.
May 23rd, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Don’t forget the only reason we have such nasty wildfires and forest fires today in the West is because we have been deliberately suppressing them for the last 200 years (when possible). This leads to a vast over-accumulation of dry underbrush and other vegetation that should have been naturally cleared every few years by fires. We really shouldn’t be putting out forest fires at all unless they start to threaten populated areas. Forest fires are completely natural – they have only become unnatural since we came along :)
May 23rd, 2008 at 6:28 pm
I forgot to add that forest fires also keep pests and other invasive species in check – by stopping forest fires, the mountain pine beetle population has exploded in number and will probably wind up killing huge tracts of forest (potentially far more than would have ever been burnt up in fires). The beetles would never have grown to such a large number if they had been regularly burnt out by fires..
May 23rd, 2008 at 6:36 pm
I LOVE the U of Leicester; their virtual autopsy site is cool. If I’d been a Brit, that’s where I would have wanted to go!
May 23rd, 2008 at 6:42 pm
This is just plain stupid – in the Midwest, they’re now _encouraging_ regular fires on the plains in order to return wildlife and plants to their natural state. Heck, some pine trees even _depend_ on wildfires for their seed cones to open.
More environmentalist “the sky is falling” claptrap.
May 23rd, 2008 at 9:56 pm
While they might be going overboard with the “controlled” burns… didn’t Native Amercian Indians do the same thing (on a smaller scale) ??
May 23rd, 2008 at 10:17 pm
are you being payed by them to post here?
May 23rd, 2008 at 11:13 pm
This is quite crazy! I never knew it was this bad.
May 24th, 2008 at 11:49 am
I find the data given is pretty useful. The new way to educate people about forest fires is worth praising.
June 6th, 2009 at 5:07 am
Thanks for the information!!