The 5 Weirdest Animal Experiments

Tue, Mar 25, 2008

Science/Tech

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

Science is frequently weird.

labrat
Image by Jean-Etienne Poirrier

We know relatively little about the world we live in. Almost every new experiment adds a little something to the general knowledge of humanity.

Sometimes, in order to gain that little bit of extra knowledge, scientists will study weird or dangerous things. Frequently they’re too weird or dangerous to use humans for study, so they’ll use animals instead. We’re not condoning this sort of thing, some of these experiments were unspeakably cruel and should never have been performed. Here are five of the weirdest animal experiments ever.

5. Kangaroo Farts

roo

This story was quite big in the media recently. Scientists have been studying the stomachs of kangaroos in an attempt to discover how they remove methane from their farts. This makes this list for two experiments really. The first is for the scientists studying how to apply this to cows. The second, and weirder one honestly, is for the scientists, whoever they are, that first decided to bottle a kangaroo fart and determine whether or not it had methane. Well done, Dr. Kangaroo fart pioneer, well done.

4. Horny turkeys

turkeys
Image by Laughlin Elkind

In the 1960s two Penn State researchers, Martin Schein and Edgar Hale, did a significant amount of research on the sexual behaviors and preferences of turkeys. That’s not particularly weird in itself, scientists are always studying the sex lives of animals. Their weirdest experiment involved a model female turkey with detachable parts, which was presented to a male. The male’s sexual interest was then gauged. Then the scientists removed progressively more parts from the model. You might expect that, after a while, the male turkeys would lose interest in this stripped down version of a turkey hen. You’d be wrong. Even when only a head on a stick was left, the male turkey was still aroused.

3.Smoking animals

beagles

This one falls under the category of “incredibly cruel” that I mentioned earlier. It’s not so weird, but I feel it needs to be highlighted for the sheer awfulness of the studies. Scientists studied the effects of smoking on animals for years, and only managed to find that lung cancer was related to smoking after decades of research. Much of this is likely because so many of the experiments were funded by tobacco companies and were hardly models of scientific procedures. In the decades of research on tobacco’s health effects, thousands of animals were forced to smoke countless cigarettes. These are “weird” because they were such poor experiments on a topic that was pretty much already known. Scientists had known for years that there was a very high correlation between smoking and lung cancer by studying the smoking habits of lung cancer patients.

2.Animals on Acid

elephant
Image by Fruggo

Speaking of unnecessarily exposing animals to chemicals, quite a few scientists were tasked with seeing what would happen if you gave animals loads of drugs. This gave us the famous “Spider on Acid” video, but the weirdest and worst experiment was likely the case of Tusko the elephant. Tusko was an Indian elephant at the Oklahoma Zoo. In 1962, Scientist Warren Thomas and colleagues at Oklahoma State University decided that he would use Tusko as a test subject to see whether LSD would induce the elephantine condition known as musth, in which an elephant becomes temporarily insane and enraged. Thomas injected the elephant with nearly 300 mg of acid, around 3000 times a normal human dose. Tusko quickly collapsed and died within 2 hours of the dose. The scientists were in the middle of a PR disaster, but insisted that, having ingested plenty of LSD themselves, they were sure the drug was safe for elephant consumption. Their experiment concluded that “elephants are highly sensitive to LSD”. Some people thought that the animal had actually been killed by drugs used to revive him. So in a crazy twist, another scientist decided to repeat the experiment twenty years later. Instead of injecting the animals, he mixed the LSD in their water with very different results. The elephants appeared drugged, but didn’t freak out or die. Despite that, it makes you wonder why two separate experiments on the effects of LSD on elephants were even allowed.

1. Two-headed dog

dog

In 1954 a Russian scientist called Vladimir Demikhov became a real life Dr. Frankenstein when he unveiled a monstrous creation, a surgically created two-headed dog. Demikhov grafted the head, shoulders and front legs of a small puppy onto the body of a huge, fully grown German shepherd. The mad scientist showed his monstrosity off for reporters, who watched as both heads of the dog lapped at bowls of milk. The milk dribbled out of the disconnected esophageal tube of the puppy head as the media watched in horror. The dog died within a short time due to tissue rejection, but Demikhov made a total of 20 of the creatures during his career. While the experiments do seem like mad science, they actually had a noble purpose. They were an attempt to figure out a way to perfect surgical transplant methods. Demikhov intended to be the first doctor to complete human heart and lung transplants, but he was beaten to the punch by Dr. Christian Baarnard. Most scholars, however, credit the Russian with paving the way for modern transplant medicine with his experiments.

Environmental Graffiti is up for four bloggers’ choice awards. You can vote for us for best entertainment blog, best blog of all time, best geek blog and best animal blogger.

If you want to find out all the latest news on the environment, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

, , , , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Chris - who has written 598 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

Chris (50% English, 50% Italian) is the evil overlord and creator of Environmental Graffiti. When he's not battling those pesky Jedi Knights, he can be found blogging about weird and wonderful environmental news. It's sort of becoming a full time job...he is quite surprised!

Contact the author

9 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. natty rob Says:

    These are a true reminder of the weird minds that some scientist have. WTF are they doing giving elephants lsd, how is that going to help us to get any where? we already know that it is great for us and that sheep eat mushrooms etc, just stop now you crazy white coated men!

  2. Sibyl Says:

    Any questions why animal experimentation should be banned worldwide? Empirical scientists leave their humanity at the lab door and we are ALL diminished by their deliberate sociopathy.

  3. Emory Says:

    Come on people… I love animals as much next as the next guy, but get serious. Wihtout animal experimentation, we would have no means for testing scientific advances. Would you prefer for us to experiment on humans? Yes, some of these experiments are cruel, and many produce fruitless results, but without most of them, our progress both scientifically and socially would be stagnant. Experimentation and testing is required for progress, case closed.

  4. Casey Says:

    These are a true reminder of the weird minds that some scientist have. WTF are they doing giving elephants lsd, how is that going to help us to get any where? we already know that it is great for us and that sheep eat mushrooms etc, just stop now you crazy white coated men!

    Why do scientists have to be men?!?!?!?!! Asshole.

  5. bob Says:

    meanies
    meanie

  6. Lucy Says:

    INNOCENT ANIMALS
    WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?!?!?!?
    TEST ON CRIMINALS ON DEATH-ROW
    THEIR GONA DIE
    SO WHY NOT GET SOMETHING GOOD OUT OF IT?!?!?

    THINK!!

  7. William Says:

    Okay… Wtf!?! The two-headed dog thing was sick… And it worked… So the dogs had trouble living (it was torture)… And when the dogs tried to drink milk, the milk dribbled out of the disconnected esophageal tube of the puppy. That’s sick, we all know that the puppy is going to die (and with the German Shepperd)… He is surely a mad scientist, a dumb scientist, even I know that connecting two animals together won’t work just like that, it’s not that simple. So the dogs died tortured, confused, troubled, sad and depressed… FUCK YOU! And this isn’t for the good of mankind, this was just for the fun of it…

  8. Reese Says:

    I dunno guys. I’m no more of a hippie than the next guy, but if someone told me they could save my life on the condition that they had to do just ONE freaky Demikhov-esque transplant first, I would say no. I just couldn’t go through the rest of my life happily with it on my conscience. Unfortunately, there are a lot of powerful people out there who take the whole “man’s dominion over animals” concept to a place it wasn’t meant to go.

    So to Emory, I submit that if we can’t progress scientifically without torturing sentient beings, maybe scientific progress SHOULD stop at that point. I for one would certainly be comfortable with that. There are plenty of experiments attempted on willing human participants who are at death’s door anyway, why couldn’t head transplants be one of them? At least a human would have a comprehension of what was happening, not be pathetically ignorant and confused like those poor dogs.

  9. Rebecca Says:

    To Lucy -
    If we were to test on criminals, and then later that man or woman was found innocent, would that be ethical?
    In the UK we dont have the death penalty - does that rule us out of conducting any research that requires biological testing?

    and to a lot of people here, may i suggest that you look at websites that aren’t anti-vivisection
    websites such as
    ‘pro-test’
    ‘about animal research’
    and various journal articles that explain the advancements made by testing on animals.
    The particuarly horrendous cases shown here were carried out before stringent guidelines on the ethics of experimentation on animals were imposed.
    Dont judge animal experimentation purely on these outdated cases.
    The kangaroo farts is quite an interesting case, methane is a major cause of global warming, and and cows produce A LOT of methane. To remove the methane would be one way of helping reduce global warming. Once you look past the experiment its sometimes easy to see the logic behind it.
    I really REALLY urge you to look at how important animal testing is for science before you make your judgement, and i especially urge you to look at the current legislation around animal testing before buying into organisations such as PETA, SPEAK, ALF and ELFs scary mongering nonsense.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. The 5 Weirdest Animal Experiments « Kitty Mowmow’s Animal Expo Says:

    [...] Here’s the link.  [...]