Wed, Jan 30, 2008
Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.
I have a serious question for scientific researchers.

Robot swarm!
Why is it that so many amazing new scientific discoveries end up being applied to distinctly creepy sounding robotics projects?
Don’t get me wrong. Robots are really cool. I’m not anxiously awaiting robot sex machines or anything like one author, but I certainly hope for a future in which robots do all my housework. It just seems like there are far too many scientists who are studying nature in the hopes of creating robots that could haunt my dreams.
First there was the water walking robot. Sounds really cool, right? It is indeed. Scientists looked at the water strider to determine how the insect was able to walk and jump on the water, then applied this to robots. All cool until they mentioned it would probably be used as a tiny spy robot that can go all over the water.
Now scientists have studied flocks of starlings and cracked the mystery behind the birds’ ability to fly in large formations, and regroup quickly after attacks, without getting confused and ramming into each other. While the information is cool, some scientists seem to think that the best use of this knowledge is not to aid our appreciation of nature, but to make more effective robot swarms.
I don’t know about you, but I have never wanted to come across a swarm of anything. The word has distinctly negative connotations. A swarm of bees is frightening enough, but a swarm of robots is worse. Robots can be helpful and useful, but I can’t think of a positive situation where I would see a swarm of tiny robots and think to myself “Thank God the robot swarm is here.” Regardless, the new research will likely help researchers in mobile robotics to devise new programs to control swarms of robots with greater ease.
Laying aside all creepy robotics talk for a few moments, the way starlings flock in formation is actually very interesting. Most people had thought that the birds kept a close watch on all birds within a certain area of space. It turns out that’s not the case. Each bird reacts to a fixed number of other birds, regardless of the size of the area. This allows the flock to expand and regroup very quickly in the event of an attack, as the cohesion of the flock relies only on the birds’ interactions with a certain number of neighbours.
The results mean the starlings are likely more intelligent than originally thought. Irene Giardina, a researcher on the study from the Centre for Statistical Mechanics and Complexity in Rome, said: “An interaction based upon the number of neighbours, rather than their distance, implies rather complex cognitive capabilities in birds.”
Bird info from Telegraph
If you want to find out more about birds, robot swarms, and the latest scientific breakthroughs subcribe to our RSS feed. We’ll even give you a free album.
“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”
January 30th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Why do I keep seeing hordes of robot soldiers like a scene from an old sci-fi movie?
OTOH, this fits in nicely with what my unschooling kids and I were discussing yesterday as we watched a flock of finches feeding on thistle seed. It’s choreography, for sure, but how they do it is the mystery that makes us think they’re smarter than we’ve given them credit for being.
Shine On,
Lill
January 30th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
January 30th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
I just hope I don’t run into swarms of those robot cockroaches.
January 31st, 2008 at 2:00 am
Or in the case of a flying robot swarm, it’s size and therefore lifting capability could be flexibly adjusted to transport different items for you.
The missing remote control whilst your on the couch, for example ;-)
January 31st, 2008 at 5:19 am
The implementation of this was “Boids”, an old program that simulated the behavior of flocks of birds. “Flock” sounds better than “swarm”, doncha think??
Anyhow, there are very simple rules that cover flocking behavior — distance from other birds, primarily. Very easy stuff to write. Best book is “Complexity”, by Roger Lewin (I think). Interesting way to think about all sorts of behaviors.
January 31st, 2008 at 9:45 am
Cool can’t wait to be the first kid on my block to have a robot swarm!
January 31st, 2008 at 10:50 am
Touche, kelly, touche. i suppose there are indeed a few instances where i might be happy for a robot swarm. I still say we call it something other than “swarm” though. Maybe “smiling robot helper group”.
January 31st, 2008 at 2:30 pm
> It just seems like there are far too many
> scientists who are studying nature in the
> hopes of creating robots that could haunt my
> dreams.
That’s because the research money comes from DoD or other similar agencies, so naturally, the focus is not on appreciating nature. :)
January 31st, 2008 at 9:39 pm
How about swarm of robots cleaning up an accident scene.
February 4th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
How about a swarm of robots designed to help clean up environmental disasters? Most likely a lot faster, more efficient, and more cost effective than calling in FEMA and the EPA. On the DoD front, how about a swarm of security bots for automated surveillance/alerts of homes/businesses. Robots are tools, just like any other inanimate objects. My computer could be used to hit somebody over the head with, but that doesn’t make it a good idea. Tools aren’t what we need to worry about, the people using them should concern us.
December 21st, 2008 at 6:31 am
A swarm of robots are either useful or dangerous. Sure it can be used for households and the like, but it can also be used as weapons of war. A swarm of robots acts as one but the components of it reacts as an individual. Take a look at the swarm of bees or a school of fish, robots can be programmed to imitate oneness but reacts individually.. just like the aforementioned flock of birds. Looks like people will appreciate nature even more because most scientific researchers look back to it. They always question mother nature. How? Why? What? When? Where? Ah! The marvels of nature! Just like what Discovery Channel says: “The world is awesome!”. ^_^.v..