home
advertise
about us
submit your news
write for us
partner with us
sign up for our beta

Human Environmental Problems Could Mean New Geological Age

January 28, 2008

Reddit Slashdot Digg StumbleUpon Newsvine Fark Mixx

There are those who say that human beings aren’t responsible for the effects of global warming or various other environmental issues.

stripmine
A German strip mine. Image by Ekem.

But according to some scientists, humans have affected the world so much that we actually need to change the name of the current geological era to reflect our impact.

We’re currently living in what is called the Holocene. The period started with the end of the last major ice age in 9600 B.C. It’s name translates to “entirely recent” in Greek. Several geologists at the University of Leicester and the Geological Society of London, however, want to change the name of this epoch to the Anthropocene (anthro for human) to reflect the effect of humans on the landscape.

The scientists have lobbied the International Commission on Stratigraphy, the international body in charge of naming geological epochs. They argue that humans have physically altered planet Earth and its ecology so markedly that a difference between pre- and post-industrial periods must be drawn.

They base their argument on what they describe as four major phenomena that differentiate the past and present. These phenomena are: a change in the worldwide patterns of sediment erosion and deposition, significant changes to the world’s carbon cycle and global temperatures, ocean acidification, and large scale changes to the planet’s animals and plants.

Jan Zalasiewicz, leader of the lobbying group and a geologist at University of Leicester, said: “Sufficient evidence has emerged of stratigraphically significant change for recognition of the Anthropocene - currently a vivid yet informal metaphor of global environmental change - as a new geological epoch.”

The name Anthropocene was coined by Nobel Prize winning chemist Paul Crutzen. He made an offhand remark in 2002 suggesting the name for the “new era” of growing human development and population.

Source: Telegraph

If you want to find out all the latest news on humans’ effects on the environment and ecology, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

Comments

2 Responses to “Human Environmental Problems Could Mean New Geological Age”

  1. pingback pingback:
    1
    Survival Acres Blog » Anthropocene Era

    […] Environmentalgraffiti.com: There are those who say that human beings aren’t responsible for the effects of global warming […]

    Reply to this comment.
  2. AvatarAdrianne
    2

    Pinback, there are a number of man-made contributory factors that may have had specific impacts on the atmospheric heating, e.g. local warming in the cities (due to housing, roads, and other resultant factors), smoke and dust over long distances or deforestation of huge forest areas. Each of the above examples may have had temporary or long lasting implications, but none of them is a major source for the strong warming or cooling trends during the last 150 years. We can say that Earth’s climate has a cyclic evolution. There were warm periods and cold periods. However, there is one thing that no one tought of. Oceans are a major factor in influencing climate. I found more on the subject on http://www.1ocean-1climate.com and I think it is a topic that shoul be payed more attention to.

    Reply to this comment.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Comment Preview: