Drought Resistant Plants Could Fight Global Warming and World Hunger

Thu, Feb 28, 2008

Science/Tech

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

Genetically modified plants are extremely unpopular in certain circles.

peanuts
Peanut plants dying during a drought. Image from APS

There are a variety of reasons for this, from fear of potential negative health effects to anger at the Monsanto corporation’s business policies with the patented seeds. But there are other groups who fully support GMO crops and research, citing the benefit to the world’s hungry brought about by plants with increased nutritional value and ability to grow in harsh circumstances.

I’m interested to see how both camps react to the newest announcement in GMO crops. U.S. and Finnish researchers recently announced the discovery of the plant gene that controls the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed and water released by a plant.

In practical terms, this means a plant that could both survive in severe drought conditions AND help fight global warming effects.

The gene they discovered controls the tiny pores known as stomata that are located on the leaves of plants. They play a crucial role in photosynthesis, as the plant absorbs carbon dioxide gas through these pores. Water vapor is also released through the stomata as the plant grows.

The researchers, writing in the journal Nature, say the discovery may allow them to genetically modify a plant that will continue absorbing CO2, and possibly even absorb more, but release less water vapor. As plants lose 95% of their water through the stomata, this would mean a plant that could survive in extremely dry conditions.

As it stands now, droughts are one of the most destructive natural forces on the planet when it comes to agriculture. In impoverished areas where many subsistence farmers are growing just to survive, a drought can destroy not only crops but lives. Many drought stricken areas are also areas of extreme poverty and hunger, so a drought resistant crop could help food production rates rise and hunger drop.

Droughts also seem to be occurring more often and for longer periods of time in many sections of the world, a phenomenon some point to as one of global warming’s effects. The American west is in the middle of a prolonged period of drought, while Georgia is experiencing a severe if so far shorter lived period of low rainfall.

The scientists who discovered the gene have been experimenting with cress and rice, although they believe they are still some years away from a viable crop. University of Helsinki Professor Jakko Kangasjarvi said: “It opens the avenue, it is still several years away but before this publication, there was no single component which would have so many different effects… there was no target to modify, now we know the target.”

Information from BBC

If you want to find out all the latest news on how the environment affects you, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

, , , , , , , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Chris - who has written 598 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

Chris (50% English, 50% Italian) is the evil overlord and creator of Environmental Graffiti. When he's not battling those pesky Jedi Knights, he can be found blogging about weird and wonderful environmental news. It's sort of becoming a full time job...he is quite surprised!

Contact the author

5 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. James Says:

    I think GM crops have a role to play in alleviating global hunger. In my blog, GMO Africa, I have always argued against demonizing crop genetic engineering. Any criticism against genetic engineering should be scientifically grounded. Fear-mongering and facts fudging will not help in this debate.

  2. Jono Says:

    The problem I have with GMO crops is that I don’t think I will ever be told the truth, partly because big money interests will only tell me what the want me to know and partly because no one may even know the truth on the long term safety.

    We evolved over thousands of years eating natural, existing plants and animals until the recent century or two where we started screwing around with all our food processing. Now we have large scale cancer and obesity. Is this due to our processed food? The big food interests are going to suppress any evidence that could harm them. Same with the GMO seed people. there is no way I can know the truth. This is why I want to stick with natural food.

  3. KT Says:

    For thousands of years we didn’t live past 40 (unless you count Moses who made it to what, 800?… right). Let’s keep your option to stick with natural food, but also pursue the possibility of GMO plants that could feed all of those who are starving.

  4. Nick L Says:

    Big Organic cannot be allowed to block scientific developments that have the potential to alleviate human suffering across the world. If your unscientific beliefs compell you to eat only natural crops (i.e. those modified by selective breeding over thousands of years), please don’t use this as an excuse to inflict suffering on millions in the developing world.

  5. Kristy Says:

    There is no scientific research by design, google Michael Taylor and “substantially equivalent” to learn how safety testing was circumvented within the FDA (Taylor then went on to be a VP for Monsanto).
    GMO’s do not solve the world hunger problem, just the opposite is true, google terminator gene. These are sterile seeds that do NOT re-seed and the US is the patent holder. Monsanto uses propaganda to promote the end of world hunger, but GMO crops are not the answer, in fact, they have ruined many farms in India, hence the thousands of Indian farmers who committed suicide.

ss_blog_claim=68ded206efcf0b5d4bf955123f191aba