Tue, Feb 19, 2008
Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.
A new study on scientific productivity has arrived at the conclusion that beer is bad for science.

Image by Tomasz Sienicki
It seems obvious, drunks aren’t very common in labs or the library after all, but the report is one of the first to take a scientific look at the impact of researchers’ social lives on their work.
The research was conducted by Dr Tomas Grim, a behavioural ecologist with the Czech Republic’s Palacky University. Dr Grim wanted to research the effect of social behaviours on scientific work, and social drinking is one of the world’s most popular pastimes. Dr Grim wanted to concentrate his research on the relationship between beer consumption and scientific productivity, and he was in a good place to do it.
The Czech Republic has the highest rate of beer consumption per person in the world. Each Czech drinks over 175 pints of beer a year on average. Dr Grim concentrated his research on Czech scientists in the field of avian ecology. I have no idea why he chose avian ecologists, maybe they’re known as hard partying types in the scientific community. He contacted Czech avian ecologists with a survey, asking about their social activities and a list of their published work since 1980.
Dr Grim said: “Based on well known negative effects of alcohol consumption on cognitive performance, I predicted negative correlations between beer consumption and several measures of scientific performance.”
After his study, his hypothesis appears to have been confirmed. He discovered “that increasing per capita beer consumption is associated with lower numbers of papers, total citations, and citations per paper.” Czech regions with higher per capita consumption fared worse than did regions with lower consumption rates.
Dr Grim says: “These correlations are consistent with the possibility that leisure time social activities might influence the quality and quantity of scientific work and may be potential sources of publication and citation biases.”
I don’t know about you, but I find it appropriate that someone called Dr Grim is saying that drinking beer will make you a bad scientist. We’ve already seen that scientists embarass themselves when they try to dance, so social drinking is one of the few acceptable outlets they have left. Leave the poor stressed-out scientists alone Grim.
Info from Telegraph
If you want to find out all the latest environmental news, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.
“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”
February 20th, 2008 at 5:51 am
It always amazes me that they can call things like this a scientific study. It completely ignores other genetic and social patterns that go along with greater alcohol consumption. Dr Grim immediately jumps to alcohol as the cause without ever asking the basic question “Is alcohol consumption the cause, or simply another trait consistent with a personality type?”
February 20th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
mistakes consequentiality for causation
February 20th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Or, perhaps poor performance causes more stress, which in turn increases alcohol consumption. But I will give Dr. Grim credit for having carefully qualified his conclusion.