Comments on: Sir Paul McCartney: Go Vegetarian, For The Planet’s Sake http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/sir-paul-go-vegetarian-for-the-planets-sake/1086 for environmentalists who don't take themselves too seriously Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:39:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Vadim http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/sir-paul-go-vegetarian-for-the-planets-sake/1086/comment-page-1#comment-68608 Vadim Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:44:59 +0000 http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/sir-paul-go-vegetarian-for-the-planets-sake/1086#comment-68608 This is a little late but recently Paul also called upon people to cut meat from their diets on Mondays. I started a campaign to help promote it: https://www.thepoint.com/campaigns/meatless-mc-cartney-mondays Everyone should join and help reduce their strain on the environment. I hope to see something like this become a norm in every American household (but maybe I'm just optimistic). This is a little late but recently Paul also called upon people to cut meat from their diets on Mondays.

I started a campaign to help promote it:

https://www.thepoint.com/campaigns/meatless-mc-cartney-mondays

Everyone should join and help reduce their strain on the environment. I hope to see something like this become a norm in every American household (but maybe I’m just optimistic).

]]> By: Jeremy http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/sir-paul-go-vegetarian-for-the-planets-sake/1086/comment-page-1#comment-36307 Jeremy Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:26:27 +0000 http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/sir-paul-go-vegetarian-for-the-planets-sake/1086#comment-36307 This article is flawed in several ways that are glaringly obvious. (this is not meant in a critical tone) 1.The first one and least important is the fab five remark. You may want to recount your beatles ;) 2. The land, water, electricity, feed, transportation, infrastructure, buildings and market of these animals is a huge untouched Item in this article. 3. The whole idea behind this article seems to be "hey paul mcartney said something" and then not expounding or adding anything of merrit to an already established idea. 4. Ill bet if you took a little more time you could re-write this article into something that truly has something creative and enlightening to say. good luck This article is flawed in several ways that are glaringly obvious. (this is not meant in a critical tone)
1.The first one and least important is the fab five remark. You may want to recount your beatles ;)

2. The land, water, electricity, feed, transportation, infrastructure, buildings and market of these animals is a huge untouched Item in this article.

3. The whole idea behind this article seems to be “hey paul mcartney said something” and then not expounding or adding anything of merrit to an already established idea.

4. Ill bet if you took a little more time you could re-write this article into something that truly has something creative and enlightening to say. good luck

]]>