New York is a Giant Birth Control Pill

Fri, Feb 8, 2008

Offbeat News

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

Two new studies have suggested that cities act like contraceptives, helping to check the population growth that has become one of the most discussed environmental issues in recent years.

newyork
Image by Ester Inbar

The Earth’s population is in the middle of a radical shift of lifestyle. In the past most people have lived in rural areas. However, a recent U.N. report announced that, for the first time in our history, the majority of the world’s population now lives in urban areas. By the year 2030, city dwellers will account for 60% of the world’s population.

Two new studies suggest that that could help reduce population growth that may be one of the causes of global warming, as the urban lifestyle has an effect on the number of children couples produce.

The first study, released by Prof Ruth Mace of University College London, deals with the radical shift in thinking that has accompanied scientific advancements, which have occurred at the same time city populations have been rising. City dwelling parents were, until recently, most concerned with their children surviving infancy. This is a natural concern when sanitation and medicine were poor, but those conditions don’t exist in most modern cities. The infant mortality rate worldwide has dropped sharply, and parents are now far more concerned that their children won’t become successful adults.

As a result, parents are now investing more time, energy, and resources into each child in a bid to ensure their later success. This has led to parents having less children and devoting more resources to each. Prof Mace believes the amount of resources invested in each child will continue to grow rapidly, leading to even further declines in birth rates in cities. She cites Italy and Mexico as countries where this has occurred, driving down birth rates significantly.

An Icelandic study suggests that birth rates decline in cities not due to the resources involved in child rearing, but because of the greater amount of potential partners available in cities. They base their theory on research showing closely related couples, such as married cousins, have a larger number of children than couples with a distant relationship.

With cousin marriages occurring far more often in rural areas where potential partners are more scarce, they argue that birth rates will drop when more people live in cities and have more choices in a partner. The researchers believe this is the reason for the population decline in Iceland, which has recently become a highly urbanised country after centuries of having a mostly rural population.

Info from Telegraph

If you want to find out all the latest crazy science and environment news, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

, , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Chris - who has written 598 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

Chris (50% English, 50% Italian) is the evil overlord and creator of Environmental Graffiti. When he's not battling those pesky Jedi Knights, he can be found blogging about weird and wonderful environmental news. It's sort of becoming a full time job...he is quite surprised!

Contact the author

10 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. anonomous Says:

    global warming is in fact not real.
    the earth is growing nearer to the sun, thus making the climate on earth warmer.

    so fuck off with this bullshit notion that humans breathing causes too much carbon dioxide.

    its just non sense

  2. twat spotter Says:

    global warming is in fact not real.
    the earth is growing nearer to the sun, thus making the climate on earth warmer.
    so fuck off with this bullshit notion that humans breathing causes too much carbon dioxide.
    its just non sense

    twat

  3. 24/7 HornyPumper Says:
    global warming is in fact not real.
    the earth is growing nearer to the sun, thus making the climate on earth warmer.
    so fuck off with this bullshit notion that humans breathing causes too much carbon dioxide.
    its just non sense

    twat

    Trolled much?

  4. johnny Says:

    the guy is right
    global warming is actually propaganda

  5. cs Says:

    Morons…selfish morons, ideology driven by political affiliatons. Have you ever seen the chart of population growth since 1900? Tell me then that we are not affecting the enviornment. Im sorry you crazy rightwingers but you cant argue with science, thats a fact!

  6. Johnny's Mom Says:

    You were an accident. Global Warming is real. Go feed the cat.

  7. Ann Onymous Says:

    Yes, global warming is a pile of crap.

  8. John Says:

    The first poster says global warming is not real and then in the very next sentence he says that the earth is getting warmer!!

    Amazing how the mind works (or doesn’t).

  9. logic Says:

    the earth is warming. it is an undisputed fact that over the past century the earth has warmed. this is not the issue! neither is the question of man’s role in the warming (its possible, although unlikely). the issue is that there are too many people on the earth and any shift in climate will be devastating because so many people rely on the resources which are currently available to them. for example, when areas become more arid (not unheard of…i.e. dust bowl in mid-west), people will need to move in order to sustain their lifestyle. since there are so many people crowding the planet, they will have no where to move, thus causing resource conflict.

    in addition, catastrophes like hurricane katrina are not uncommon or necessarily caused by “climate change.” what has changed is the amount of people affected by the natural occurrence of severe weather. people need to re-frame the debate. i hate to say it, but the bush administration is right is adopting a policy focusing on adaption rather than reducing co2. lets get ourselves out of this quagmire of a debate and prepare for the future problems facing our global population!

  10. fish face Says:

    I cant believe you fellows, the article was hardly about global warming(these words were only said once in the shortest paragraph in the article). This article was not trying to tell you either way whether it exists or not.

    The article was just saying that there is interesting evidence that leads to the conclusion that people have fewer kids in cities or none at all. It raises many questions such as “why when people have so much more choice do they end up not choosing?” And why is it considered good parenting to raise a child to be a good adult, wont they then have missed all the fun of being a child?”

    How come every time i read the comments on one of these articles no one ever has anything interesting to say, that adds to the content of the article, just a bunch of moron lunatics, raving about something irrelevant to the topic, you might as well go on to a VW Camper forum and shout about global warming there.

ss_blog_claim=68ded206efcf0b5d4bf955123f191aba