Environmentalism in 1666

Wed, Feb 13, 2008

Offbeat News

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

Our journey through environmental history has so far taken us from medieval England to ancient India and the Roman Empire.

shogun

Today we revisit Japan’s Edo period in the mid-1600s, a time of turmoil that resulted in an amazingly complex environmental policy that still influences our ideas on conservation today.

The Edo period began in 1603 when Tokugawa Ieyasu seized power and established the Tokugawa shogunate, with headquarters in the city of Edo. During this time the Tokugawa shoguns, or generals, effectively controlled the country, becoming even more powerful than the Emperor in Kyoto.

The period preceeding the beginning of the Edo period had been a time of growth both in terms of economics and population. By 1570, shortly before the Edo period began, Japan’s population had reached 10 million. This spike in population and the corresponding need for natural resources led to a serious environmental problem for Japan. For the first time, the country was faced with widespread deforestation.

Deforestation was not an entirely new phenomenon. As long ago as 600 A.D. there had been localized deforestation, most notably in the Kinai region, as wood was required for housing, war, or monuments. This didn’t become a serious environmental problem at first since Japan’s population was small and there were plenty of forests for use while the others were abandoned. In fact, many people at the time actually encouraged deforestation so they could use the newly cleared land for agriculture and created new growth forest products that were used for fertilizer, fuel, and animal feed.

When the population reached around 10 million, however, this system of forest exploitation became unsustainable. For about a century, beginning in the mid 1500s, timber harvests for use in ship-building, construction, and firewood ravaged the Japanese forests as Japan’s population ballooned.

In the mid 1600s, people started to notice the environmental issues that deforestation had wrought in Japan. Not only was it much harder to find decent timber, but soil erosion had become noticeable. Erosion in turn led to flooding, mudslides, and the silting up of rivers and streams.

In 1666, the country had reached a breaking point and the shogunate took action. They implemented a national plan to reduce logging and replace the forests. To begin with, one had to receive the approval of a high government official to harvest and use wood. In addition to that, the government began to encourage the planting of tree saplings and the study of forest management.

The plan was incredibly effective. By the early 1700s, Japan had a complex and successful system of forestry management in place. Villages applied their community approach to agriculture, which had made for successful rice harvests, to forestry management. In time, some of the world’s first tree plantations were created.

With the creation of trees as a form of controlled agriculture came far greater research and understanding into trees. Scholars and woodsmen developed new techniques to plant and care for tree species, many of which are still applied today.

While Japan’s forestry management system was effective, it was by no means fast. It took hundreds of years for the country to recover from the damage caused by exploitative use of their natural resources. The program was judged to come to a successful end only in the early 20th century. That’s something to think about with our own consumption of resources.

If you want to keep up with the rest of the series and find out all the not so late breaking environmental news, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

, , , , , , , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Chris - who has written 598 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

Chris (50% English, 50% Italian) is the evil overlord and creator of Environmental Graffiti. When he's not battling those pesky Jedi Knights, he can be found blogging about weird and wonderful environmental news. It's sort of becoming a full time job...he is quite surprised!

Contact the author

3 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. Nataly Short Says:

    Very interesting history.
    I wonder why Great Britain never reforested their poor looking landscapes.

  2. Roger Jardine Thomas Says:

    Very interesting history.I wonder why Great Britain never reforested their poor looking landscapes.

    Nataly. You ask a big question in a few words. Part of it is large landowners over the last few centuries using the land for grazing.

    This is especially true for Scotland with the Highland Clearances. This is an unresolved political debate

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/civil_war_revolution/scotland_clearances_01.shtml

    Sheep come in at page 3

    Then we have the preservtion of open moorland for shooting. Ecologically these are things like deflected seres or plagio climaxes.

    When Foot and Mouth disease hit the UK in 2001, I sent this model of the outbreak to Prime Minister Tony Blair. He sent his thanks by return of post, as far as I have been made aware it was the only accurate modelof the outbreak available in the UK in March 2001. Media analysis might show this was the source which Ministers used to brief the media from the start of April 2001.

    http://celticlion.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/foot-and-mouth-assessment/

    Part of the answer to your question is perception. People think the UK landscape is ‘natural’ -a grazing ecosystem.

    Some get really upset at the thought of shrub and tree cover returning. They don’t see that as ‘natural’. Its a cultural block, the lakeland poets described the fells, so people don’t now want trees.

    This also links with commercial return on land use. Shooting on a moor will return more income than allowing it to revert to it’s natural mixed woodland/ forest climax.

    The report to the PM covers land use and is a basic introduction to ecology etc and it’s relationship to post FMD economics. It is for the informed lay person eg a Prime Minister or Cabinet Minister could read it and be able to answer general questions from the media. It’s on a side resource blog I use.

    hope its of some interest

  3. Roger Jardine Thomas Says:

    Japan is also a Buddhist as well as Shinto country.

    Buddha means forest sage. So culturaly has a closer affinity with woods than a Christian religion. The Celts in the UK were pushed to the fringe Wales Ireland and Scotland by the Romans, who also liked clearing land.