Sign up for an invite
The Psychiatric Impact of Polygamy
Photo: MormonWoman
Polygamy in North America began with the founder of the Mormon religion, Joseph Smith (though not all polygamists are Mormons, though the majority are, and not all Mormons are polygamists). In 1842, the Bible was rewritten as the “Doctrine and Covenants”. A section in this hallowed writing included verses explaining that a man shall have many wives. It was believed that Moses had many. It was polygamy that kept Utah from becoming a state until the US government was tricked into its inclusion in 1890 (Utah isn’t the only state famous for polygamyist practices, so are Texas and Arizona). Raids and arrests followed suit and polygamy was proclaimed illegal. However, in the modern world where gay marriage is now considered not only legal but acceptable, one may wonder if polygamy will follow suit. As it stands now, polygamy is rarely punished.
Photo: public domain/Wikimedia
It was the introduction of Warren Jeffs in 2007 that suddenly catapulted polygamy into the limelight once more. People had a cornucopia of questions they wanted answers to regarding this odd living arrangement.
I will cover the psychological side of polygamy, while Lyn Lomasi will cover homeschooling in polygamyous sects.
Photo: Metron
According to some studies there are well over 80,000 people in the US alone living in polygamy. They, no surprise, have the highest birth rates. Many argue that the living arrangement of having 10 to 60 wives is grounds for charges of child abuse, human trafficking, physical and psychological abuse of women and children, enslavement, oppression of individual wealth and medical neglect. This article is not to persuade one to engage in or disengage in polygamy - that’s a personal choice for one to make.
Photo: Trenthead.com
While the stereotype is firmly implanted in the average American mind that this is mostly a “white people” living arrangement, please take note. Polygamy started in Africa, in ancient times. Due to the lack of fresh, young, virile black men in the US, with numbers of these men dissipating every year, well educated black women have now joined polygamist sects in record numbers in hopes of securing a partner.
Consider their plight for a moment. Nearly three out of four white women are married compared to one out of three black women. If a child is born out of wedlock, there’s a 67% chance the child is black, compared to a 25% chance of the baby being white. Black men are just not as plentiful now.
Polygamy affects everyone. According to this study, 33% of those on welfare are living under this marital arrangement and are legally considered single mothers, not married. Polygamy has been considered by many to promote domestic violence and increase government costs through law enforcement — some people go as far as calling polygamy “intimate terrorism”. This could be one of the reasons why adoption agencies don’t consider polygamists when they seek to adopt a child.
You will find that everything is shared in the polygamist sect. Birthdays, husbands, children, homes, and funerals are just some of the things that draw a large crowd. Funerals, for an example, are so frequent, that a polygamyist will go to an average of 20 a year. Research indicates that living in a polygamist relationship increases a woman’s chance of being abused by their partner from 8 to 15 times above the normal average for women in traditional relationships.
Studies have shown that unlike other animals, humans build a lasting, unbreakable bond with the “partner they reproduce successfully with”. This leads many to wonder, how polygamy could be natural rather than asking for big trouble?
Photo: More Good Foundation
Forget TV, junk food, electronics/gadgets, and modern conveniences. These social pressures are thrown out in lieu of growing food, building homes and public buildings, shunning contact with “Gentiles”, as non-polygamists are considered to be. Even so, some things are allowed in polygamy sects. Cell phones, high-end SUVs, sometimes computers, and laser surgery are some of the things that are highly favored and utilized.
Living arrangements vary by culture. Women in the US live in separate wings of homogenous 4 to 10 bedroom houses, some built just in one day, reflecting the solidarity of the community. Some live in granny cottages. Typically the labor is divided up among the wives — probably to diffuse possible jealousy. You will see that one wife will educate the children (homeschooling), another sews, and another is the janitor.
Photo: Ray Wheeler
In other countries, particularly in Mali where polygamy is the norm, the husband is legally married to and lives with one woman. But, the other “wives”, who are financially dependent on other males in the family, get an occasional visit by the “husband”. The women who consent to being in a relationship like this where they live alone and are dependent on male family members, are often unable to get married, whether because they are poor or thought to be ugly. For these women, being in a polygamous marriage is better than not being in one at all and/or being homeless.
Jealousy or fighting is not considered an issue, claim many “sister wives”, as these women are raised to be passive and subordinate to others, especially to their husbands. One wife might be closer to another or one might get on everyone’s nerves more, but they excuse that as being a part of a normal family. In contrast, this article explains that women living under polygamist arrangements are far more likely to have physical and psychological problems (such as paranoia) compared to women in traditional relationships.
Often the wives are biological sisters. They are thrilled to share the same husband because they know they have a great man and want to share that happiness. Traditionally, women are expected to have at least 10 to 15 children each. The median age of the mothers who give birth in Utah, according to this article is 14. To give one perspective of how young that is, the median age for women in the US giving birth is 36.6 (as most women are putting off childbirth later and later).
Photo: Amy
If one has noticed that there are far fewer men and many more ladies in polygamyist sects, this would be quite astute. The least bit rowdy, individualistic, and opinionated boys are kicked out of the sects at the very tender age of 13 or 14 typically. This is because the demand for women is high, and the more males there are, the fewer women there are to go around. Thus, females are highly cherished and coveted in this part of the world.
Many people view polygamists as homosexual. This would assume that all the wives and the husband have consensual sex at the same time. The argument that links homosexuality and polygamy is made to justify gay marriage. However, as this article points out, the women living in polygamy are in fact heterosexual and, even though they share one husband, they don’t have sexual relations with each of their sister wives.
Photo: think-link.org
The world of polygamy is a fascinating and strange one. However, in the same way that beauty is defined in the eyes of the beholder, so is strangeness defined by the "wives of the beholder!"
Where applicable permission has been granted to publish photos in this article
Related Posts
Popular in Cultures
Comments
Asher Kade says:
I'm sorry if you took it that way. I was repeating a quote made by the article you mentioned about gays and polygamy being erroneously associated. It was not the opinion of myself. I did state in the article that I was not making a judgement on any lifestyle. Further, I was applying recent news, polygamy, and what is currently being said about polygamy (i.e erroneously being associated with homosexuality) to show how polygamy applies to recent social issues. I wanted the reader to know that polygamy is not a subject matter only affecting a small margin of people in the US, but rather all over the world, in many different social arenas, and in recent news.
A lot of people I have talked to think that polygamy is an ancient and outdated subject matter. However, it is quite a heated topic right now, as you have indicated. Homosexuals are outraged at being compared to polygamists, and visa versa.
So, I am trying to educate the world about polygamy so they can be more informed and more understanding of the differences.
I believe with this exhaustive explanation that you can rationally see my point that this was not a juvenile smear campaign against any entity in particular. To each to their own. I steer far away from exerting my opinion in any article I do.
Thanks for reading.
TamamShud says:
"I'm sorry if you took it that way." There's nothing so pointless as the false apology. Instead of apologizing for the false statements you made, you apologize for the fact that someone saw through them.
"I was repeating a quote made by the article you mentioned about gays and polygamy being erroneously associated."
The only article I mention is your own work, and at no point did you say that the association was erroneous. The statement from your article here:
" However, in the modern world where gay marriage is now considered not
only legal but acceptable, one may wonder if polygamy will follow suit."
Is <b>your</b> words, and it invokes the slippery slope argument - if we allow same-sex marriage, polygamy will follow. Since polygamy is taboo, for good reason, you smeared GLBTQ people.
"It was not the opinion of myself." By nature, any thing you author is your opinion unless you cite some external source. You did not, and misrepresented the way that homophobes use polygamy as an argument to defame same-sex couples.
"I did state in the article that I was not making a judgement on any lifestyle."
Homosexuality is not a lifestyle, and those who refer to it in that way, betray their prejudice against GLBTQ people. The meme of describing homosexuality as a lifestyle is something that homephobes use, not GLBTQ people and those who respect them, as a way of minimizing the meaning of our relationships.
"Further, I was applying recent news, polygamy, and what is currently
being said about polygamy (i.e erroneously being associated with
homosexuality)"
And yet, what you actually did was assert that same-sex marriage <b>was</b> associated with polygamy, making that claim twice (the one quoted above and "The argument that links homosexuality and polygamy is made to justify gay marriage.) Further, you misrepresented your citation, which states:
"A remarkably large number of people link polygamy and same-sex marriage.19 Some have done this to bolster their case against granting martial status to same-sex partners.20"
and
"Even more, closer examination yields the counterintuitive conclusion that it is actually more difficult to
justify the main claim made by supporters of same same-sex marriage than to deny the main claim made by polygamists."
You've made the false claim that people are using the issue of polygamy to support same-sex marriage, and that completely misrepresents what supporters of same-sex marriage have been saying on public record. And it misrepresents how opponents of same-sex marriage use the issue of polygamy - in the way you have, intentionally or not - by asserting that legalizing same-sex marriage will lead to polygamy.
"I
believe with this exhaustive explanation that you can rationally see my
point that this was not a juvenile smear campaign against any entity in
particular."
Implying that anyone who does not see things your way is not rational, is abusive and very poor journalism. Your explanation completely failed to address the issues I raised, and, simply compounded the prior errors with new ones. Your article did indeed smear GLBTQ people by twice leading readers to conclude that legal recognition of our relationships would encourage polygamy.
While the goal of educating the world is laudable, doing so with false information is not.
Lyn Lomasi says:
Excellent job on this! Interesting indeed how you were more scientific than I. Sharing both of our articles on facebook, twitter, etc. :)
Asher Kade says:
Thanks Lyn! It is also interesting how no one sent you negative comments on homeschooling and occult!
Seriously, I never though polygamy was such a stormy topic!
:)
Asher
PS, I will be putting these articles on my blog probably tomorrow...(which will make it shared on numerous social networking sites too)
I wonder what my other readers will think about polygamy, homeschooling, and the debate about legaling polygamy.











TamamShud says:
First off, this article reinforces anti-gay prejudice by associating same-sex marriage with polygamy.
Second, "The argument that links homosexuality and polygamy is made to justify gay marriage. " is a false statement. The argument that links homosexuality to polygamy is made to condemn and inhibit same-sex marriage. Because polygamy is still taboo, homophobes assert that same-sex marriage will lead to polygamy, or that same-sex marriage and polygamy are equivalent. Its an attempt at guilt by association, a way of transferring the taboo against polygamy onto same-sex marriage.
"However, in the modern world where gay marriage is now considered not only legal but acceptable, one may wonder if polygamy will follow suit."
With the statement above, you've maligned millions of same-sex couples, smearing them through the slippery slope argument. Polygamy is a predominantly, almost exclusively heterosexual phenomena.
Have the decency to leave GLBTQ people out of the injustice and harm that is polygamy.