Fri, Jan 4, 2008
New technology means solar power could one day provide all the world’s energy needs – but governments must do their bit.

Until a few years ago the suggestion that solar power might provide the answer to the intertwined problems of long term energy security and climate change would have been dismissed as a pipedream. The high cost of solar cells, their inefficiency in converting the sun’s rays into electricity and the lack of state investment or assistance for renewable energy start-ups meant there was little hope.
But now, thanks to some determined innovators, the rising cost of fossil fuels and the widespread realization about the damage they cause and some clever market regulation, a solar transition is rapidly become a reality.
In Germany, solar energy already provides 3 gigawatts of electricity, the equivalent of four large fossil fuel power stations. In 2003, the German government passed a law obliging energy companies to purchase solar energy from anyone who can produce it at nearly double the market price. The result? Homeowners and business flocked to buy photo voltaic (PV) cells and Germany’s 300,000 PV cells now account for nearly 60% of the world’s solar panels. This upsurge for demand for in solar technology has had the knock-on effect of stimulating research and development.
It is this technological development that is really exciting environmentalists. At the beginning of the decade PV cells rarely converted more than 5% of the sunlight they captured into electricity. Last year, researchers at the University of Delaware set a record with over 40% efficiency using new manufacturing techniques. While it obviously takes time for these developments to come to market, many commercially available PV cells now operate at around 20% efficiency. As a result of these increases in efficiency, the retail price of solar-generated electricity is rapidly approaching the prices of nuclear and gas-generated electricity in many parts of the world.
(The growth of the solar power market continues to snowball, and stocks in companies in what is regarded by many as the fastest-growing sector in the world are now worth $100 billion.)
While many of those rushing to join the party are happy to simply continue developing existing silicon-based technologies, scientists at the University of California have other ideas. Building on the invention of conductive plastics (for which Alan McDiarmid, Hideki Shirakawa and Allen Heeger won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 2000) the researchers hope to use soluble materials to manufacture PV cells using an incredibly cheap printing-type process. While they are unlikely to achieve efficiency above the 10% mark in the next couple of years the vastly less expensive manufacturing processes involved mean that commercially competitive solar energy could emerge a lot quicker than previously imagined.
So, now that it is clear that at some point in the not too distant future solar energy will become commercially competitive, how far can the technology be taken? A New Scientist article on the subject estimated that the global economy’s total energy demand stands at 15 terrawatts. Working on the assumption that PV cells reach a commercially viable efficiency of around 20% the article estimated that an area of just 300,000km2 would be needed to meet the entire planet’s electricity demand. It sounds like a lot, but it fact it’s an area not much bigger than the UK. There seems little reason why one day huge areas of Saudi Arabian, Australian or Saharan desert couldn’t be filled with massive solar power plants.
So why won’t it happen tomorrow? Well for a start, whilst a few western European nations are implementing the German model, most western governments are simply failing to support fledgling renewable energy companies. For example, last year the UK government decided to plough millions into extending the life of its nuclear and fossil infrastructure and provided limited help for energy startups, let alone potential consumers of renewable energy.
There are also still a plethora of technical issues to overcome. Firstly, new research has shown that the small windmills and solar panels that are fitted to our rooftops often create more greenhouse emissions during manufacture than their use curtails. Secondly, how do we store the energy solar power creates for a rainy day? Hydrogen is notoriously dangerous to transport and there are huge inefficiencies when you start converting and moving energy about.
But the facts remain that whilst our politicians celebrate the idea that at some point in the future we might set binding green house gas targets, true alternatives to fossil fuels are starting to become a reality.
If you want to find out all the latest developments in solar power and renewable energy news, why not subcribe to our RSS feed, we’ll even throw in a free album.
January 5th, 2008 at 1:55 am
Just thought I’d mention that 3 Megawatts is not anywhere near the output of a single large fossil fuel power station. I’m presuming you meant 3 Gigawatts?
January 5th, 2008 at 2:52 am
Adam, thanks very much - we corrected that. It was intended to be gigawatts! Glad you picked up on that.
Chris
January 5th, 2008 at 8:39 am
I am looking forward to this day. However, as we transition to solar, we need a way to store the electricity during the night time. This is another complimentary technology that needs to develop in line with solar.
January 5th, 2008 at 8:49 am
There was a company that is starting to sell at 99cents per watt. search on DIGG for “99 cent watt itunes of solarpannels” or something like that
January 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Your link “fitted to our rooftops often create more greenhouse emissions during manufacture than their use curtails” leads to a page that discusses Carbon capture but not the technical issues of solar panel production.
January 5th, 2008 at 3:21 pm
This article seems to confirm what i have been saying for sometime. If the u.s. would pass a law that all power companies would have to buy any excess electricity generated by PV cells on homeowners,or businesses roof tops power companies could stop worrying about building new expensive, polluting power plants.. Then they could concentrate on making the electricity grid the best and most efficent possible..as for storing electricity the sun is always shining somewhere in the world, and existing power plants could pick up the slack when needed..
January 5th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
“There are also still a plethora of technical issues to overcome. Firstly, new research has shown that the small windmills and solar panels that are fitted to our rooftops often create more greenhouse emissions during manufacture than their use curtails.”
Your link here is to something about Carbon Capture and Storage. I highly doubt the manufacture of a wind turbine or a solar panel would create more CO2 than their use would offset. Do you have the correct link for this.
I’m surprised this article doesn’t mention Nanosolar, which is now selling thin-film solar panels for around $1 per watt (e.g. $200 for a 200 watt panel). At that price solar is competitive with burning fossil fuels.
January 5th, 2008 at 5:21 pm
A solar system will offset its production greenhouse gas emissions within three years. If you want to talk about inefficiencies of power production you should do some research on all large power plants that lose 80% of their power just in production and who knows how much after it has been transmitted a few hundred miles on the grid to the end user. This article does a good job at highlighting the misconception of solar. Thanks for nothing.
Mike
January 5th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
I think you’re being a bit hard on michael, mike. He’s suggesting that solar is the wave of the future, not that we should crap all over it because it’s not 100% efficient. Oh, and I was the one who inserted the links everyone. My bad on the carbon capture one, it was supposed to be something relevant to the manufacture of windmills but I’ve since lost the link. I believe there is an article on the subject in the Environmental Graffiti archives, however, if anyone is interested.
January 5th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
reading this article made me think about the old lightning in a bottle trick that Benjamin Franklin had invented. Yes, totally unrelated to solar power, But I was wondering if any body has ever considered trying to capture lightning on a large scale?
There’s got to be regions that get higher than average thunderstorm activity, and if you could setup lightning rods to capture the electicity…(in high capacity capacitors?)…
also another idea would be to build portable windfarms that can harness power from hurricanes. They would need to be portable, and able to be deployed with short notice, considering how many hurricanes the US gets every year. Its far fetched, but plausable..
Chad
January 6th, 2008 at 4:51 am
I totally agree, power utilities must by law be required to buy power from anyone that produces it on a small scale . Then lots of tinkers and inventors would be spurred on to develop ideas they have on how to produce it for themselves and to sell. Many would produce it at low cost and using things they already have around. Many of my family are tinkers and have converted air conditioners to heat pumps, etc.
January 6th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
The fact that central Asia’s deserts will be covered in solar panels(xD) makes me laugh for it sounds environmentally wrong.. Also, it’s going to be a problem in the pacific area..
If only there’s some way to store those large amounts of energy..
Oh.. Lightning has a very large voltage.. but i doubt it has enough current to run a house..
portable windmills are very inefficient for it is largely mechanical and occupy large places..
If there’s only some way that the invisible, unknown energy can be harnessed.. okay.. i’m just living in my own dream now.. lol
seriously.. the only way to boost the efficiency of those panels is to convert the sunlight directly to power (which, i think, is already done), to shrink it up, and to not use dark color.. yea.. i know.. sounds too far-fetched..
January 8th, 2008 at 2:20 am
These solar power farms seem to be about as good of an idea as anyone has had to this energy crisis. It seems to me with photo voltaic cells approaching 40% efficiency and averaging 20% the main obstacle is storing or transferring the power. I believe that without a more efficient way of storing energy such as a highly efficient method for converting water into hydrogen and re-harnessing that energy the only other option is to transport the energy. In the sim city video games one of the power plants you could build for your city was a microwave transmission plant that could receive electricity via microwaves transmitted from space. I often wondered where the energy would come from. A possible approach to this problem could be to launch a network of satellites capable of efficiently relaying the power to energy hubs across the world. After all, as one reader commented, the sun is always shining somewhere.
January 28th, 2008 at 1:37 am
Any idea where this NEW RESEARCH came from?
“Firstly, NEW RESEARCH has shown that the small windmills and solar panels that are fitted to our rooftops often create more greenhouse emissions during manufacture than their use curtails.”