<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the Recyclable Plastic Bicycle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/green-living/recyclable-plastic-bicycle/1653/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/green-living/recyclable-plastic-bicycle/1653</link>
	<description>for environmentalists who don't take themselves too seriously</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/green-living/recyclable-plastic-bicycle/1653/comment-page-1#comment-81480</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/?p=1653#comment-81480</guid>
		<description>Sorry to sound unenthusiastic, but I can&#039;t see what this is trying to achieve. I think a comparison with a steel framed bike would make more sense than comparing with relatively energy intensive aluminium.

Steel is easy to recycle, doesn&#039;t degrade when it is recycled, and existing steel bicycle frames have for a hundred years been melted down to make (amongst other things) other bicycles. Also, anyone with brazing / welding skills can easily repair a steel frame. I can&#039;t see that being possible with polypropylene.

Finally... how about a design which is for a proper useful bicycle with mudguards, lights, rack, chain guard etc. The chain is made into a much shorter life part by not being protected by a chain guard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to sound unenthusiastic, but I can&#8217;t see what this is trying to achieve. I think a comparison with a steel framed bike would make more sense than comparing with relatively energy intensive aluminium.</p>
<p>Steel is easy to recycle, doesn&#8217;t degrade when it is recycled, and existing steel bicycle frames have for a hundred years been melted down to make (amongst other things) other bicycles. Also, anyone with brazing / welding skills can easily repair a steel frame. I can&#8217;t see that being possible with polypropylene.</p>
<p>Finally&#8230; how about a design which is for a proper useful bicycle with mudguards, lights, rack, chain guard etc. The chain is made into a much shorter life part by not being protected by a chain guard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
