Thu, Jul 19, 2007
When Wal-Mart and McDonalds start offering organic and fairtrade products, you know ethical consumerism is taking hold. But is buying ethically all it’s cracked up to be? Or does it simply distract us from taking collective action that can make a real difference?

Scientists believe that despite their eco-friendly image, some organic farmers create greater pollution and contribute more to global warming than conventional farmers who use pesticides and fertilisers.
According to the Manchester Business School study, certain organic foodstuffs — such as milk, chicken and tomatoes — produce more greenhouse gases, create more soil and water pollutants and require more energy and land than those grown on non-organic farms.
The Soil Association, the country’s main organic certification body, conceded that organic farming was not always energy-efficient. However, it claimed these disadvantages were vastly outweighed by other factors not assessed in the study, such as animal welfare and soil conditions.
This article has been released from greener living magazine, where you can find the easiest ways to go green - no tree hugging required!
1 Trackbacks For This Post
July 21st, 2007 at 4:18 am
[...] This story takes place in a phallic tower, one that slightly resembles a haunted tower at the University of Toronto. Inside this tower there was a group of people who had come together to try and make an extremely important decision. They met inside a relatively normal conference room with eggshell white walls and a fake oak door. The room was three times longer than it was wide and had a mirrored ceiling. At one end of the room there was a table with food placed out, all of it was organic because the people there simply hated the environment. [...]