14 comments

Username
Password
* (required)

K (not verified) says:

Simply astounding.

Dan (not verified) says:

Really impressive example of long exposure photography, shows how gravity creates a parabola out of every trajectory, even our most powerful rockets.

Whit (not verified) says:

Links to the original photos, please. I see no indication of where these images are in the gallery link you're using below each photo.

Carl (not verified) says:

Hey, mine curves like that (endeavourbeauty) too!

BobPixel (not verified) says:

"[E]ach launch is part of the bigger picture that is space exploration, the long-term benefits of which may far outweigh its costs as we overcrowd our small planet."

What an excellent point! Recently, the utility company PG&E agreed to buy space-based solar power. This could be tyhe start of some real tangible benefit to humanity and the environment!

Bilsko (not verified) says:

Great set of pictures. One observation:

You should be a bit more careful assessing the environmental impact of a space shuttle launch. The indirect impacts (all of the embedded emissions in manufacturing and transporting the equipment) are certainly worth some concern.

But take more care with statements like "Shuttle launches undoubtedly affect the environment, both directly with their emissions..."

If you look at the fuel sources used for the shuttle launch, I think you'll be surprised. The Shuttle relies on the two Solid Rocket Boosters (SRB) and the External Fuel Tank for most of the thrust to get it in to orbit. The primary fuel source for the SRB? Aluminum. 70% of the weight of each of those SRBs is Aluminum. Potassium perchlorate is used as a catalyst - so the products of combustion in each SRB are potassium chloride and aluminum oxide. One of them is commonly used for fertilizer. Neither is considered a criteria pollutant or GHG.

The External Fuel tank is even more benign and simpler. It has liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The product of combustion is water vapor - which condenses out before contributing to the GH effect.

There is some potential for NOx emissions from Nitrogen present in the air in and around the combustion chambers, but its probably pretty small.

So all in all, the direct emissions from a shuttle launch are negligible and GHG contributions are essentially zero.

Bilsko (not verified) says:

I stand corrected on my look at the SBR emissions. This link is really helpful to identify the emissions proportions:

http://www.bautforum.com/1056479-post22.html

The CO2 emissions are tiny (but present nevertheless!)

The Carbon Monoxide emissions are a bit more alarming

juegos (not verified) says:

I like the second picture looks awsome, almost like a missile has been launch

Sarah (not verified) says:

The first image is really amazing, with the moon next to the launch.

Jon Winthorp (not verified) says:

Very cool pictures of the space shuttle launching. :-)

Ivan (not verified) says:

If you believe it or not, not only NASA performs space launches.
In fact, in recent years the Russian space agency "Roskosmos" did more launches than any other space agency in the world.

Sorry, I have no pictures, but here is Roskosmos' Youtube channel dedicated to rocket launches, some of they simply amazing:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=51E1DC20A0890FEC

Anton (not verified) says:

I love Super Florida foto

Anton (not verified) says:

Very cool pictures of the space shuttle launching.

gary (not verified) says:

fantastic