Scientists Design Giant Elevator to the Stars

Wed, Oct 1, 2008

Featured

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

lego spaceman
Image: Splorp

Written by new contributor Cole Hendricks

Since time immemorial, we have imagined what it would be like to climb to the heavens. With the advent of modern rocketry, a few brave souls, and many more brave robots, have managed to slip the surly bonds of Earth.

But what if, instead of an expensive and perilous ship that only a few could find passage on, we built a bridge to the stars that anyone could cross. Imagine that, instead of having to strap yourself to thousands of tons of rocket fuel, getting into orbit was a simple as boarding a train, albeit a train that goes straight up for over 100,00km (62,000 miles) and happens to be by far the most ambitious structure humanity has ever imagined creating, but a train nevertheless. For the last several decades, this is exactly what many scientists, engineers and futurists have been not only imagining but designing and even, to a certain extent, testing.

space elevator
Image: Superm401

The first complete description of the possibility of a modern tower of Babel is attributed to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, a nearly deaf Russian rocket scientist who is considered by many to be not only the progenitor of the idea of a space elevator or as he called it, the ‘heavenly funicular’ but also the father of the entire field of manned space-flight.

In his 1895 paper, ‘Day-Dreams of Heaven and Earth’, he wrote regarding his Funicular:

“As one went up such a tower, gravity would decrease steadily, without changing direction; at a distance of 36000 km, it would be completely annihilated, and then it would be again detected . . . but its direction would be reversed, so that a person would have his head turned towards the earth…”

Since the publication of Tsiolkovsky’s ideas, the concept was generally accepted as a fascinating thought but an engineering impossibility. No known material was strong enough to withstand the astronomical forces that such a structure would be exposed to. However, as material science has progressed enormously even to the point that we are able to build custom molecules and materials on an atom by atom basis, and particularly with the discover of the immense strength of fullerene carbon nanotubes, the difference between what we know how to do today, and what we would need to know in order to build the Heavenly Funicular, are small enough that engineers and scientists and governments around the world are taking a serious second look at what it would take to build a train to space.

nasa image
Image: NASA

The main reason that a space elevator is so compelling is the dramatic reduction in energy costs it would provide. It currently costs about $20,000 USD to put 1 kilogram into orbit, a space elevator could lower that cost down to an estimated $250/kg essentially opening the door to space wide open. Understanding this value, one nation has even taken the very recent step of claiming that it will build a space elevator and is setting aside a significant amount of money to do so. The Japanese government, has very recently stated that they are budgeting $9 Billion USD towards a concrete proposal to overcome the theoretical obstacles to elevator construction and eventually begin the assembly of the 100,000 kilometer tall device. This announcement is highly significant in that many experts estimate that a functioning space elevator with a budget of $10-$15 billion could be completed in as little as 12 years. The Japanese have scheduled a conference in November 2008, bringing together experts from around the world to further develop their plans for an elevator to the stars.

Source 1, 2

If you want to find out all the latest news on the environment, why not subscribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

About the author: Cole Hendricks is a person who apparently can’t think of any appropriate adjectives to describe himself. His resume is a carousel of schools, random jobs, and quixotic business ideas. 26 years old, he currently lives in Sacramento, California but hopes to start travelling again soon. Mostly he likes finding out about stuff and then writing about it; nice work if you can get it.

, , , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Cole Hendricks - who has written 7 posts on Environmental Graffiti.


Contact the author

17 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. lee Says:

    100,000 km? i think you mean 100 km or 100,000 metre! the atmosphere ends at around 120 km, and the circumference of the earth is only 40,000 km!

  2. Jack Lewis Says:

    Arthur C. Clark authored a book about a stairway to the stars.

  3. Drew Says:

    Hopefully they are smart enough to build the elevator to a geosynchronis space station. You couldn’t really build it to anyhting else, and form there people could have little space ferries to take them to places like the moon or other stations.

  4. Erich Stauffer Says:

    I remember reading about space elevators in Arthur C. Clarke’s books. Its nice to see them getting closer to reality. When we were young our teachers told us that we might all be able to vacation in space, if not work there. Whether that is through Virgin Galactic, Elon Musk’s SpaceX Program, or Japan’s Space Elevator, this seems a lot more plausible. Cheers.

  5. Kevin Says:

    When this was actually news a decade ago, one big problem came up, and that is shielding of solar radiation by anyone aboard a transport on the ribbon. This thing isn’t shooting through the atmosphere, it is literally inching its way up, exposing the passengers to lethal doses of radiation. So far, no solutions have been developed that could potentially protect humans from this.

    So, what’s next for you, news on the development of AIDs medication? The exciting breakthrough of solar power? I heard a rumor about something called global warming, it is breaking news, you heard it here first!

  6. tehmeh Says:

    Wait, what? Wouldn’t this be like making a skyscraper out of pencils? Really expensive pencils with people on top? Imagine a terrorist attack on the base of that thing; one well placed missile.

  7. randy gagnon Says:

    what if someone farts on the way up? it sounds like a long ride….

  8. Anonymous Says:

    This is impossible, the rotation of the earth would topple it.

  9. Val Says:

    Tsiolkovsky was actually Ukrainian. Being a representative of that nation myself, it pains me to see how Russia gets the credit for Soviet scientific achievements when 30%-50% of its rocketry and space sectors were designed, built and maintained by Ukrainians. Just getting some facts straight..

  10. loxias Says:

    How would you deal with space “junk?” What about all the crap (satellites, screwdrivers, garbage, etc) that is constantly in orbit? There’s no way you could keep that stuff from running into this “elevator.” You’d have to clean up the atmosphere first, and, well, that’s not gonna happen…

  11. Cole (Author) Says:

    It would really be more like tying a string to a satellite than building a skyscraper (not that that’s any less ridiculous/awesome). And the thing would almost certainly be guarded by an absurd amount of high-tech defense systems. As far as farting on the way up — the things we do for science.

  12. Phlip Monroe Says:

    Just cracking the how on this is going to be amazing. How in the world do you build something into space? It might be easier to start from space, build down, and meet somewhere in the middle. I have heard of this device for decades and there is even a Voyager Star Trek episode with one in it, but how in the world do you build something 10 times the height of Everest?

  13. Joe Says:

    Doesn’t matter if a terrrorist hits the bottom. Essentially, the space tower won’t really be connected to the earth, but will instead be orbiting. The center-of-gravity of the whole string will be WAY out in Geysynchronous orbit. So, if you attack the very bottom, it doesn’t matter it might cause some minor vibration, but part of mastering the whole design would be in learning to dampen these harmonic vibrations from weather, etc.

    And the material being used would be strong enough to withstand forces that make a missle look puny. It would for all practical purposes be terrorist-proof, unless they had access to nuclear weapons – which would just damage the loading infrastructure, even then not the string itself too much.

  14. Julian Says:

    Well, for one thing they’re really strong pencils too: Hundreds of times stronger than kevlar (bulletproof vests), and considerably stronger than the ceramics used in tank armor, so they can take a crapload of damage. Even if they do break, there’s no worry about death by giant space yo-yo as it wraps around the Earth, as only a ’small’ section (a few hundred miles or so) would actually fall. The rest would hit the atmosphere so fast that it burns up, making the world’s biggest, coolest, and most expensive shooting star. Also, since the base would be in the ocean, those hundred miles would make a big splash, but probably not damage anything. Second, you can destroy the base, certainly, but the upper station is actually in orbit and doesn’t need any support from the base. In fact it might go UP a bit.
    The biggest problem is making sure airliners don’t smash into the insanely long, relatively thin cable, since that would be less than healthy for the plane (::slice::). Of course, we already put navigation lights on TV towers for the same reason- this case just needs considerably more lights/warning beacons.
    Its worth mentioning that, because 62,000 miles is a loooooong trip, the elevator car would really be more like a ship or a small building, so no worries about claustrophobia (or farts).

  15. tracy Says:

    One problem that makes the Space Elevator subject to destruction is that it will attract high voltages from space. When satellites extended tethers in space they had high voltage flows that disabled the experiment. No tethers are used in space because of this. The Elevator would become a wire that would ground on earth that would punch through the double layer capacitance field of the earth. The long line would become electrified and any solar disturbance (like flares from the sun) it would become a channel for huge deadly electrical charges. The whole thing would fry and be destroyed fairly quickly.

  16. sabina Says:

    these scientists test fate all the time and they are always wanting a pat on their backs for the most absurd. i pray they would be forgiven for all things are lawful unto us but not all things are expedient.

  17. g.fielding Says:

    How would the tether be raiaed into a low stationary orbit and attached to a space station when the to a moving at different speeds? Would I raise the tether with helium gas filled balloons, or lower the tether for the space station in low orbit? would the tether be under the simular stresses as a shuttle on re-entry? if so then how much maintainance work would be needed and could the lift/train still opperate during maintenance work? has anyone considerd Electro Magnatism used in bursts to clear the lift/train of the earths gravity. As the fields are emitted from the poles the effect would be stronger there. Is anti gravity possible. I’d think more like Farraday and newton, and less like (Coca Cola or Sony) Has anyone got advertising rights to space or the moon? No? you might want to consider it!!!

ss_blog_claim=68ded206efcf0b5d4bf955123f191aba