Lawsuits Will Save the Polar Bear

Tue, Mar 11, 2008

Ecology

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

As a wide-eyed environmental idealist, I naturally assumed that it would be “the people” that got the environmental movement rolling.

polar
Image by Ansgar Walk

I figured we’d succeed with some petition signing, some marches, maybe a few celebrity appearances.

I was an idiot. As an American, I should have known better. The way to win isn’t through the hearts and minds of Americans, it’s through lawsuits.

I’m only half kidding. Lawsuits really can be particularly effective political devices. That also seems to be the reasoning of the National Resources Defence Council, the Center for Biological Diversity and Greenpeace. They’ve filed a lawsuit against the Bush administration for missing the deadline on whether to include the polar bear in the Endangered Species Act.

The government has been delaying the decision for months after missing a January 9 deadline. Campaigners believe this is because the government wants to sell oil and gas leases in polar bear habitat, an action that would be made much more difficult should the bear be named an endangered species.

Andrew Weitzer, director of the NRDC’s Endangered Species Project, said: “The Endangered Species Act is absolutely unambiguous: the Fish and Wildlife Service was required to make a final decision months ago. Now it’s up to a federal court to throw this incredible animal a lifeline.”

Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological Diversity said: “The Bush administration seems intent on slamming shut the narrow window of opportunity we have to save polar bears.”

According to the NRDC:

“Since the petition to protect polar bears under the Endangered Species Act was first filed in February 2005, new science paints a dim picture of the polar bear’s future…Global warming is worsening, with impacts in the Arctic outpacing predictions. September 2007 shattered all previous records for sea ice loss when the Arctic ice cap shrank to a record one million square miles – an equivalent of six times the size of California – below the average summer sea-ice extent of the past several decades, reaching levels not predicted to occur until mid-century.

Shrinking sea ice also drastically restricts polar bears’ ability to hunt their main prey, ice seals. In the spring of 2006, scientists located the bodies of several bears that had starved to death. Unprecedented instances of polar bear cannibalism have also been documented along the north coast of Alaska and Canada.”

I commend the efforts of the groups. In a time when most lawsuits appear to be frivolous money grabs filed by ambulance chasing lawyers with bad TV commercials, it’s refreshing to see one that’s actually trying to make a difference.

Info from National Resources Defense Council

Environmental Graffiti is up for four bloggers choice awards. You can vote for us for best entertainment blog, best blog of all time, best geek blog and best animal blogger.

If you want to find out all the latest news on the environment, why not subcribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

, , , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Chris - who has written 598 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

Chris (50% English, 50% Italian) is the evil overlord and creator of Environmental Graffiti. When he's not battling those pesky Jedi Knights, he can be found blogging about weird and wonderful environmental news. It's sort of becoming a full time job...he is quite surprised!

Contact the author

3 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. Endangered Species Says:

    Don’t knock the legal system! Squeaky Wheels need some way to get the grease.

    The “frivolous lawsuit” myth is pushed by the right wing, but in reality it’s pretty hard to file a lawsuit — some people I know considered filing a medical malpractice lawsuit, and found that it would cost them $25,000 to $50,000 just to get started.

  2. Duscany Says:

    It’s hard to too excited over the alleged plight of the polar bears given that their numbers have gone up 400% (from 5,000 in ther 1960s to 25,000 today). No wonder one government biologist said that it’s hard to justify puting an animal on the endangered species list when its numbers are increasing so fast.

    As for the notion that polar bears will starve if the polar icecap melts and they can’t hunt seals, polar bears, like the grizzlies from which they are closely related and with which they sometimes interbreed, are omniverous creatures. They can and will eat the same things that grizzlies do. If grizzlies manage to make it through the winter earch year, polar bears can do the same thing.

    This notion that polar bears are going to vanish is an old wive’s tale for scaring children and credulous city folk. We’ve had four previous warming periods like the current one in the last 1,500 years. The polar bears made it though those times just fine. They will make it through the current global warming too.

    That is, if they need to make it through anything. There is lots of evidence, including the current bitter winter and at the moment a larger and thicker ice pack than we’ve had for the past three winters, to suggest the latest warming cycle is over and we are already headed for cooler times.

  3. liairercisa Says:

    I’m new here.. just wanted to say hi!

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Wonk Room » Blog Archive » Wildlife Director Traps Employees in Ethics Catch-22, Violates Own Code Says:

    [...] under investigation by the Interior Inspector General for possibly violating the Scientific Code by repeatedly missing Endangered Species Act deadlines to list the polar bear, despite clear scientific [...]

ss_blog_claim=68ded206efcf0b5d4bf955123f191aba