10,000 wildebeest drown in freak accident

5 years ago Nature

Conservationists were in tears last week as over 10,000 wildebeest drowned in a freak accident – that’s over 1% of the total species population and over three times the life-loss of 911. There was no unusual flooding at the time and no extraneous circumstances to the deaths, so what went wrong?

Wildebeest crossing river

Every year, over a million wildebeest undertake an epic voyage of over 2,000 miles. From their calving grounds: the Serengeti Plain of Tanzania to the lush Kenyan vegetation to the north of the continent, the animals are followed by herds of zebras and Thomson's gazelles. This year however, something went disastrously wrong.

The wildebeest were attempting to ford Kenya’s Mara River at an incredibly dangerous point. They did not realize how steep the banks were until it was far too late… The first few animals failed to cross, while others continued to stampede behind.

Terilyn Lemaire, a conservation worker with the Mara Conservancy witnessed the accident. She describes how once the wildebeest, “jumped into the water, they were unable to climb up either embankment onto land and, as a result, got swept up by the current and drowned." The final result…?

Utter Carnage

Thousands of lifeless bodies washed up on the muddy banks of Kenya’s Mara River. Some floated downriver, others found obstacles. Underneath a bridge, a pungent island of carcasses piled up. For the scavengers of this world - the crocodiles, storks, and vultures, their next meal was an easy one. However, the next few weeks will be hazardous – the health of the water, the lifeblood of the Serengeti landscape will no doubt be affected.

Lemaire added that "I would imagine that such a significant decrease in population would have an effect….but what that effect would be and to what extent, I cannot say."

An Afterthought

Mother Earth can be cruel but also kind. Weird occurences such as baby animals becoming friends and cockroaches turning into zombies happen all the time, but are not usually covered in the mainstream media. So if you find this information useful and would like to get updates, feel free to subscribe to our RSS feed.

Cool Links From Around the Web

Comments

Old Comments

Jim says

Nov 10th, 2008 at 12am
Typical of environmentalist's disdain for humanity.

wildebeest masai mara migration says

Mar 22nd, 2008 at 12am
You know what i think? All this publicity that the wildebeest migration in masai mara and serengeti is generating of late needs to be checked so that it doesn't go out of control. Too many visitors might have an effect on the masai mara and serengeti eco system which these wildebeest actually depend on.

apoint says

Oct 15th, 2007 at 12am
I called Kenya Wildlife Service kws.org to confirm the details. The PR guy handling this issue said it was 5,000 not 10,000 as wildly reported by the local and international media. An offical posted a press release on my blog concerning this issue here http://www.africapoint.net/news/10000-wildebeest-dead/

kasilas says

Oct 7th, 2007 at 12am
Oh dear God how small minded some of these previous posters have been. They are however very correct its totally wrong to compare 911 to this accident. It was 1% of the population that died. Thats what something like, at present, 60 Million people dieing. On a par with world war two not two bloody buildings attacks. Dont get me wrong. I work in emergency services and think 911 was a very bad thing done by desperate men. But the near religious reverence for it is crazy. It was a terrorist event, stop making it into the subject for a two minute hate.

lilnigsta says

Oct 4th, 2007 at 12am
Yeah, its offensive to compare animal life to human life. I realize animals are "beings" as well. but I don't see how a natural disaster (mother earth will do as she pleases with her offspring) involving a supposed 10,000 animals can even remotely be compared to one (much less the thousands of 9/11) single human life taken out of anger/vengeance/anything-but-self-defense. It paints a poor picture for what environmentalists represent.

swift says

Oct 4th, 2007 at 12am
People, life is life. It is not in any way offensive to compare it to human life. They are one and the same. We value our fellow humans above all else because of the bond we share with others like us, but we are all animals. Those who take offense to this need to realize that we as human beings have trained ourselves to contantly live a lie... From wearing clothing, to being shameful of our bodily functions, down to issues like this where we disassociate ourselves from the "Animal" world by saying "We're people, they're animals." You're wrong. Get over it. The author of this article meant nothing sensational by comparing the loss of life here. The facts are the facts. I myself have caught slack for comparing the deaths suffered in the 2004 Asian Tsunami and 9/11 and pointing out how ridiculous it is that years later 9/11 seems more important than an event where ONE HUNDRED TIMES MORE PEOPLE DIED, yet because most of them weren't First World citizens, there doesn't seem to be a care. The same goes for Hurricane Katrina, which we still haven't been given an accurate number of fatalities, and the War on Terror which MILLIONS of people have died in so far. These are facts. Look them up.

samtron says

Oct 4th, 2007 at 12am
"the problem you two have is the disparity between the value of human life and the life of other animals." Your house is on fire, and I'm a fireman (fire fighter if you wanna be P.C.). I rush into your burning home and see a mouse and your 2 year old son in a room. I only have enough time to grab one, thus leaving the other to burn to death. Who do I save and why should I leave the other to die? Human life, even yours, trumps a random animal. As much as it pains me to say this... even some Nazi KKK Amway salesman (salesperson) would be pulled out of the burning house over the mouse (OK, I'll pull that person out s l o w l y or at least toss the mouse out a window to give it a fighting chance). And yes, author did make the connection, how many wildebeest died compared to how many humans died... these are two different events on all levels. Apples and terrorist and using 9/11 as some sort of bench mark for nature is in poor taste. I'm not saying the author can't say it... they can spew out any more stupid comments they please, but those of us who thing have the same right to call them to the floor for being stupid. 'tis late and I'm going to start watching another MST3K. Thank you.

samtron says

Oct 4th, 2007 at 12am
opps... those of us who THINK have the same right to call them to the floor for being stupid... a little bit of the kettle calling the pot black there. :)

young says

Oct 3rd, 2007 at 12am
I think you got dugg because of the offensive comparison you made between the wildebeest and the vitims of 9/11. Please edit your entry.

samtron says

Oct 3rd, 2007 at 12am
In what way can one compare the events of 9/11 to this? So if there are 10,000 waterlogged wildebeest in the rivers and of those, and 208 crocodiles, storks, and vultures choke to death while eating these dead wildebeest, will the next statement be "208 dead crocodiles, storks, and vultures... that is 4 times the deaths on 7th July!". And how is the number of 10,000 figured. Hard count? Count of a given area and then multiply? Don't get me wrong, in it's own way, it is sad that X number of wildebeest died... but that is nature, not an event caused by a screwed up "faith". It is an insult to try and compare or link a wildebeest to human life.