PETA Says Horseracing = Dog Fighting. They're Wrong.

4 years ago Lifestyle

http://inlinethumb48.webshots.com/41135/2133276700103329676S600x600Q85.jpgPhoto:
Image from Wikimedia Commons

Anybody that saw the Kentucky Derby Saturday was treated to a spectacular race, and then immediately robbed of that memory with one of the most heartbreaking sights in racing. Eight Belles, the first filly running in the race since 1996, which having just turned in the best finish by a girl since Winning Colors, collapsed and broke both ankles shortly after finishing.

When a horse is that severely injured, the track doctors are faced with a tough decision: a Barbaro-style, months-long, publicity stunt of a death watch, or putting the horse down. Eight Belles was euthanized on the track. PETA, maybe my least favorite advocacy group of all time, and never able to miss an opportunity to turn public opinion against them, posted this on their blog later that day:

While the trainers, jockeys, and owners may weep their crocodile tears today over Eight Belles' euthanasia, they will be back on the track tomorrow, putting other horses at risk. Thoroughbreds are raced on hard dirt surfaces—like the one at Churchill Downs. Their bones simply can't take it, as Eight Belles' two broken front legs showed last night. Despite the wealth associated with thoroughbred racing, for the horses—most of whom end up broken, cast off, or sent to Europe to be killed for the dinner table—it's a dirty business and no better than dogfighting.

There are so many things wrong with this statement that I could go on for hours, but I won't. Suffice to say that Kentucky has a farm that receives significant taxpayer subsidy that houses retired thoroughbreds. More importantly, let's look at the last sentence of this uneducated salvo; an assertion that horseracing is no better than dog fighting.

http://inlinethumb56.webshots.com/43255/2742604480103329676S600x600Q85.jpgPhoto:
Too soon? Image from Wikimedia Commons

I'll say that no person who could possibly make that statement could have ever been around a trainer, jockey, owner, because the love--yes, love--that develops between the animals and those that work with them on a daily basis. However, that's an emotional argument, and therefore inadmissible. No, this is more appropriately cast into proper relief when I point out that in dog fighting at least half of the animals die, and all of them live in the most deplorable conditions imaginable.

Here's a dog kennel:

http://inlinethumb51.webshots.com/41586/2730420620103329676S600x600Q85.jpgPhoto:
Image from Wikimedia Commons

Here's a horse farm:

http://inlinethumb50.webshots.com/38449/2701439660103329676S600x600Q85.jpgPhoto:
Image from Wikimedia Commons

I'll take this moment to note that in the 134 years of the Kentucky Derby, this is the first time a horse has had to be euthanized. Then there's the issue of the track surfaces--PETA seems to think that horses can't run on hard, hard dirt. I'll point out again that Churchill Downs has a phenomenally low injury rate, despite being known for having a rocket-fast inside track.

This is a bit of an aberration, and a testament to the team behind the track surface at Churchill. You see, the new wave in horse racing, and the safest surface yet, is polytrack, a plastic turf that absorbs the shock of a giant, running animal, crashing down on it. Polytrack is slowly taking over racing, and has been installed in the other holy site of horse racing, Keeneland, where it's had a phenomenal safety record.

PETA is grandstanding for their own political gain, they're doing it in a phenomenally stupid way, and they're doing it over the body of a horse that made a lot of people cry very real tears on Saturday.

Environmental Graffiti is up for four bloggers’ choice awards. You can vote for us for best entertainment blog, best blog of all time, best geek blog and best animal blogger.

If you want to find out all the latest news on the environment, why not subscribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

Cool Links From Around the Web

Comments

Old Comments

Koalabear says

Feb 12th, 2010 at 12am
I think when he meant "This is the first time a horse had to be euthanized" i think he meant on the track.Barbaro was euthanized after months of pain and trying to heal.

equine laminitis says

Sep 2nd, 2009 at 12am
PETA is completely ridiculous, yes it is sad that the horse was put down and nobody wants to see that but it surely wasn't because of neglect. These race horses, especially the ones who race in the big races are treated better than most humans. They are professional athletes and are cared for by the best in the business. Occasionally a tragic accident like this happens but its not enough for PETA to cry foul.

Sharon says

Mar 29th, 2009 at 12am
Quote from Marcus "If you only looked to see how many racing facilities and horses are out there, you would know that they can be bought by gamblers on the race. These horses are then cared for on the cheap in hopes to make the new owner a quick buck." Where did you work in the industry?? I am an owner/trainer and I can honestly tell you their care is not "on the cheap". Peta is nothing more than a bunch of loud-mouthed radical idiots who do not have a clue what they are talking about.

Lilly says

Aug 6th, 2008 at 12am
I also believe that dog fighting and horse races are wrong!! :-(

Steven says

May 18th, 2008 at 12am
Many unprofitable horses are euthanized by their owners for a $60 fee---it's a business, and the killing of unwanted horses happens on a regular basis. Also, it is true that U.S. race horses get sold to buyers who sell off the horses for meat that will end up on Japanese and European dinner tables. There's a report on this on HBO Realsports that aired on May 12th, 2008. According to a May 2008 interview on PBS' Newshour, U.S. trainers are totally dependent on drugs when it comes to the development of a winning horse. It's more than feasible that there's a direct correlation between unnatural drug-induced muscle mass and the strain it puts on the bones of racehorses. Check out my May 14th, 2008 post on this issue---it will enlighten.

Semirhage527 says

May 7th, 2008 at 12am
I'm no PETA fan, but I have to agree with them on this issue. It's great that horsetrainers love the horses -- unlike dog fighters -- but if the industry really cared about the health of these animals, they wouldn't race them before their bones fully formed. Postponing horse racing by just a few years would do wonders for the animals and their bone development. I suppose we'd rather see that extra speed of a 3 year old horse, than show concern for the well-being of the animals.

an0n1 m0us says

May 7th, 2008 at 12am
endangering the health and/or lives of animals for human entertainment is wrong, simple as that. It's irrelevant how much apparent care the horse racing industry might give to horses. In the end they endanger the lives of those horses each and every time they race. Those in the equine industry seem to think a bond forms between horses and humans that supercedes whatever activity humans choose to put horses through. This is false. Unless a soul can have free choice, there is no real bond. All horses have their spirit 'broken' or tamed according to human desires. Once this is done any horse/human relationship becomes one of master and slave, just like brainwashing if you replaced a horse with the human. People need to wake up to one cold hard fact: 'the sport of kings' is exactly that - there to make rich Mr Burns-style fat cats even more wealthy until they feel like genuine kings. Take the money away and few people would bother racing horses.

LisaDroesdov says

May 6th, 2008 at 12am
This post is very poorly written. I also disagree with the final assertion of PETA that horse racing is like dogfighting, but one retirement farm that houses Thoroughbreds is scarcely an effective argument against the reality that the racing industry churns out far more losers than winners, and the losers have to go somewhere. How many owners are going to put a losing horse up in luxury for life? I can tell you not many. I own one of the discarded Thoroughbreds who was on his way to dinner plates in Europe when I rescued him by buying his freedom from the meat truck. In my four years on the board of a horse rescue, I helped to oversee the rescue of dozens of others in the same situation, and watched hundred more loaded onto the kill buyers' trailers. We couldn't save them all, or even make a dent. Discarded racehorses all have to go somewhere, and many of them do end up just like PETA asserts; and I'm no great fan of PETA myself.

Numbski says

May 6th, 2008 at 12am
Y'know....I was frustrated to see this happen. I don't follow horse racing, and my frustration wasn't that the horses were being abused. No - it was that with all of our technological advances, we still can't seem to help a horse with a broken leg. We wind up taking a life over a broken bone. PETA is spelled wrong. It should be PITA. Go do something constructive, like find a way for these horses to be properly treated, and don't sit here and find an excuse to rip on people and their familiars. Ugh.

Edward says

May 6th, 2008 at 12am
The article is wrong when it says "this is the first time a horse has had to be euthanized." Remember Barbosa being euthanized just months ago?... http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/horse/news/story?id=2747087