The Ethics Of Smart Pills

Fri, May 23, 2008

Business/Politics

Opinion piece by Ben Ray


The real breakfast of champions. Image from Betacells

We human beings have finally reached that point in our development where science is going to begin making a giant difference to how we interact with the world. For several years now we’ve been able to use laser eye surgery to repair eyesight, but now repaired vision is often better than 20/20. We’ve always used coffee to energize our minds, but now there’s Ritalin, which according to 1 in 5 readers of the journal Nature, isn’t just for ADD patients anymore. No, we can now give ourselves a competitive advantage over each other if we only bend the rules a little bit. And this is just the first generation of development.

The problem is that the driving force behind the use of these drugs is social attitudes towards them. The reality is that more people want drugs, of all kinds, more than they can get their hands on -it’s just the nature of the beast. To think that that’s how it works right now, when there’s a marginal improvement, is one thing–imagine the amount of abuse that could potentially be encountered once the next generation of cognitive stimulants comes to market.

And because people want the drugs, and in numbers far too high to effectively police–ask any official about cracking down on vicodin abuse, and the right-wingers will think about it; ask about ritalin and you’ll receive bipartisan laughter. It may yet be time to consider deregulating “smart pills.” We already have coffee out on the market, and it’s a stimulant that’s progressively more addictive, psychoactive, and forces consumers to drink more and more every day. Why not ritlain? Or whatever the next wonder drug is? If it’s readily available online, or through a friend, or a complicit doctor, shouldn’t we just be able to take our business into public?

Source: Economist

Environmental Graffiti is up for four bloggers’ choice awards. You can vote for us for best entertainment blog, best blog of all time, best geek blog and best animal blogger.

If you want to find out all the latest news on the environment, why not subscribe to our RSS feed? We’ll even throw in a free album.

This post was written by:

Ben - who has written 216 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

I'm a freelance writer working in Louisville and Lexington, USA, home of fast horses, big trucks, and lots of people that deny global warming. I graduated from a small liberal arts college, and started a career in sales before thinking that it was awful, and quitting to become a writer. Get your popcorn ready...

Contact the author

4 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. Francesco Says:

    I totally agree with the problems mentioned. As the number of drugs is increasing the side effects related to it are also increasing proportionally

  2. Ian Kemmish Says:

    The most general argument against deregulating drugs of any kind is that crooks don’t have pension plans. Legalise something that’s Mostly Harmless and they’ll just move on to something more toxic. It’s an arms race that has an easily foreseen, pretty unpleasant end point, since crooks have no compunction about killing their customers, whereas national health services generally do.

  3. Francesco Says:

    Most of the people in the world are suffering from any of the disease and their life is running on the drugs. One gets bored from his life when he comes to know that his life is nothing without these medicines.

  4. Gwenny Says:

    We already have coffee out on the market, and it’s a stimulant that’s progressively more addictive, psychoactive, and forces consumers to drink more and more every day

    ?!!?!!! I’ve been drinking the same about of coffee every morning for 15 years.