Wed, Oct 24, 2007
After being outed by documents leaked to the Guardian newspaper yesterday, the British government admitted that it is abandoning its policy of having 20% of Britain’s energy supply from renewable sources by 2020.
In a bit of confusing political gibberish, Energy Minister Malcolm Wick said that Britain would have 15% of its energy from renewable sources by 2020, but that lowering the percentage did not actually mean it was backing away from the 20% EU target.
Mr. Wick pointed out that the Brussels deal on renewable targets did not say that all EU members had to have 20% of energy from renewable sources, so long as Europe as a whole achieved this target.
This comes in the wake of the Guardian’s report yesterday, in which leaked briefing documents showed the government planned to reduce the severity of climate change pledges, and that they were seeking much lower targets before they have to sign binding agreements in December.
Wick argued that Britain is still committed to fighting climate change, stating that: “At the end of the day, renewables is a means to an end. The end is bringing down carbon emissions.” He says that they are negotiating with the EU on their renewables target, and that it will still be a significant figure even with the lower target.
The climate change initiatives to be reduced were agreed to by former Prime Minister Tony Blair. They have been found by the administration to be too expensive and encumbered with practical difficulties.
The report suggests that raising the renewable energy level in the UK from its current 2% to a still low level of 9% by 2020 would cost £4 billion. Renewable energy in the UK is still in its infancy when compared to many European nations, particularly in the popular wind and marine power areas.
Source: Guardian
If you find this information useful and would like to get daily updates, feel free to subscribe to our RSS feed.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:36 am
would it really cost just £4bn to raise the level by 7%. does that include consultancy fees? considering the 54 richest people in britain earnt an estimated £126bn last financial year yet paid a staggering 0.14 per cent in tax. if for just one year we closed these ‘loopholes’ that only the fattest of cats fit through we would be a good deal closer to recovering the governments estimation of between £97bn and £150bn in lost tax revenue. At the estimated rate of £600million for every percentage increase in renewably sourced energy then it would cost just £60bn to achieve 100%. - clearly one should not assume that if a 7% rise costs £4bn that it would cost the same for every 7% increase i am just trying to put into perspective that not achieving ecological goals is not a question of inability but rather, lack of desire or economic interest or some other twisted motive. luckily in my democracy i can choose between two sides of the same coin or between positive images without too much substance.
interestingly the independents main story today reads ‘Over the past 20 years, almost every index of the planet’s health has worsened. At the same time, personal wealth in the richest countries has grown by a third.’
http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/mark_steel/article2439509.ece