Carbon Credits to be Used to Fund GM Food Crops

Tue, Jan 8, 2008

Business/Politics

Environmental Graffiti Will be Changing Dramatically Soon. Get a Sneak Preview By Signing Up Here.

US biotech firm Arcadia Biosciences has announced a plan to help fund the planting of genetically modified rice with carbon credits.

chinaricepaddies
Rice paddies in the Chinese mountains

The company will work with the Chinese government to give farmers who plant their crops carbon credits, which they can then sell on the global carbon trading market.

Arcadia is touting its GM rice as a greener alternative to the regular crop. The plant has had a gene inserted to make it absorb nitrogen more easily. This means less nitrogen fertilizer can be used to yield the same results. Most plants absorb less than half the nitrogen in fertilizer.

Nitrogen fertilizer is thought to account for around a third of all agricultural emissions worldwide. The agricultural sector is alleged to produce 17% of all industrial greenhouse gas emissions, more than even the transportation sector. Fertilizers are also a large producer of nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas 300 times more powerful than CO2, and their runoff pollutes water. The company says that growing their rice, rather than normal rice, globally would save the equivalent of 50 million tonnes of CO2 and generate $1.5 billion in carbon credits for farmers.

Arcadia president and CEO Eric Rey said: “A technology that allows farmers to participate in carbon credit markets will give agriculture a clear incentive to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. It’s a way for farmers, and us, to make money, while doing something positive to help the environment.”

The company is working with the Chinese government in the northern province of Ningxia, which uses more fertilizer than any other area in the country, on the first step of the project. Arcadia is running experiments to measure the emissions from traditional rice growing. This information is necessary for Arcadia to achieve its goal of making the rice growing scheme part of the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism, which would give clean technology projects carbon credits as a reward. Arcadia hopes to have the GM planting scheme ready by 2012 in order to take advantage of new carbon markets they think will be created by the successor treaty to the Kyoto protocol.

Arcadia is not just applying this nitrogen uptake improvement gene to rice. They also want to create GM wheat, sugarbeets , maize, rape seed oil, cotton, sugarcane and sod, all of which they hope could also be grown for carbon credits. They hope to expand their program globally. Rey said: “This could be used in all major crops around the world. Considering the growth in global population and the need to increase food production to feed them, this technology could be an important tool to minimise the impact of agriculture on global warming.” UK government officials are helping the company develop their idea.

Arcadia still has a few hoops to jump through before the project is completed and GM rice is actually grown. They must get regulatory approval from the Chinese government to both plant the crops and to allow the farmers to sell it for food. China has allowed GM crops to be planted and sold before, but has never allowed GM staple foods like rice or soy to be grown and sold for consumption. The project will likely meet with some resistance by anti-GMO protesters.

I’m personally in favor of it, although I know a lot of people, especially in the EU, absolutely hate GM food. I’ll eat it all day. They’re not making Tomacco here, just improving the nitrogen uptake of staple crops. Nitrous oxide is an immensely potent greenhouse gas, and runoff from fertilizer is a big source of water pollution. Anything that can reduce the amount of fertilizer used is going to have a big positive impact on the world’s environment. US farmers have been growing GM crops for a while now, and I haven’t seen anyone that can really blame their ill health on eating them, but I have seen a massive chunk of the Gulf of Mexico turn into a dead zone from fertilizer runoff. I say tackle the more obvious problem. What do you think?

If you want to find out all the latest news on everything from carbon credits to GM crops, why not subcribe to our RSS feed, we’ll even throw in a free album.

, , , , , , ,

You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts From the Intertubes

“The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else.”


This post was written by:

Chris - who has written 598 posts on Environmental Graffiti.

Chris (50% English, 50% Italian) is the evil overlord and creator of Environmental Graffiti. When he's not battling those pesky Jedi Knights, he can be found blogging about weird and wonderful environmental news. It's sort of becoming a full time job...he is quite surprised!

Contact the author

5 Comments For This Post

Leave a Reply

  1. Craig Mackintosh Says:

    Hi Robert. I’m not sure how much you’ve read on GMOs, but these links might be of interest to you:

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/12/01/the-food-revolution-genetic-engineering-part-i/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/12/08/the-food-revolution-genetic-engineering-part-ii/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/12/23/the-food-revolution-genetic-engineering-part-iii/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/04/20/the-health-dangers-of-genetically-modified-foods/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/04/19/who-benefits-from-gm-crops/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/03/02/pay-monsanto-or-starve/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/02/09/the-doomsday-vault-seed-preservation/

    http://www.celsias.com/2007/04/14/the-future-of-food/

  2. Robert Says:

    Craig,
    I know plenty of environmentalists have problems with GMO food, which is why I found the idea of funding the initiative with carbon credits so funny and something that would interest our readers. That being said, alot of the arguments against GMO foods are of the “Well there’s not enough research done on the effects of GMO crops yet”, but people argue on how unhealthy GMO food is, presumably using research that hasn’t been done on GMOs according to their previous argument. I’m sure there’s research out there to support both sides.

    I think GMO food should be labeled since people should of course have the option not to eat it, but I’m not afraid of it personally. I know corporations are often shady and seem scary, but you could say that about everyone in the meat industry and most of the agribusiness giants even ignoring GMO, not to mention the health effects of all the things beef cattle and many non-gmo crops are treated with. Something’s going to kill me, and if climate change scientists are right, its much more likely to be related to pollution and global warming than eating GMO crops. Plus it’ll probably be heart disease anyway. My feeling is, if it can do a massive service to the environment, I’m for it. I’ll even volunteer to eat a whole bunch of the rice.

  3. Jason Says:

    It’s not only about potential health effects of GMO foods. GMO is a threat to our world in other ways.

    There is NO turning back. GMO crops don’t stay contained in the fields that they are planted in. Cross pollination due to insects and wind have guaranteed that the new strains of food will be with us for a very long time. If they are found to be harmful, it may be too late to do anything about it.

    There is evidence that GMO crops may actually need more pesticide applied to them than their non-GMO counterparts.

    GMO techniques promote a system of monoculture as farmers are encouraged to use one or two new strains rather than the wide variety of heirloom crops that used to exist in a specific area.

    This is not an exhaustive list. I for one feel that there are more powerful changes that can be made for our environment. Reducing meat intake in favor of more fruits and vegetables has a profound impact on our environment, the amount food available for others, and our health.

  4. Craig Mackintosh Says:

    Hi Robert

    Yes, definitely of interest to readers and everyone.

    I’d be interested to know your thoughts after you’ve read at least some of the articles I’ve posted.

    Best regards

    Craig

  5. CDM Consultant Says:

    Thank you very much for sharing this information.I read your complete article
    Carbon credit can also beneficial for companies to use GM food crops,not only for cut down CO2 emissions.

ss_blog_claim=68ded206efcf0b5d4bf955123f191aba